This is interesting. Re: Focus?

by SpannerintheWorks 53 Replies latest jw friends

  • SixofNine
    SixofNine

    Why have you created a Kats 1 and 2?

    Is this just your way of throwing a spanner in the works?

  • SpannerintheWorks
    SpannerintheWorks

    Six,

    So are you saying that the Kats who is Simplesally on JWD is the Kats in the quoted website http://home.socal.rr.com/crit ?

    Spanner

  • SixofNine
    SixofNine

    I'm saying that, imo, the Kats and focus that you have found may help you understand JWD's Focus' sense of humor, but won't help at all in trying to understand who he/she/it is.

  • SpannerintheWorks
    SpannerintheWorks

    OK, but Kats aka Simplesally (JWD) stated that she was Focus aka Crit's wife on

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/forum/thread.aspx?id=31855&site=3

    The quoted web site http://home.socal.rr.com/crit is all about Focus aka Crit. So Simplesally=Kats in that site, Yeah?

    But Simplesally is disfellowshipped and is divorcing Focus aka Crit according to http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/forum/thread.aspx?id=31855&site=3

    But in http://home.socal.rr.com/crit she says she's a Witness, attends meetings (with Focus aka Crit), Crit gives links to WBTS web site, both are pro WBTS. Everything is hunky dory.

    Am I missing something?

    Spanner

    Edited by - SpannerintheWorks on 13 November 2002 3:50:26

  • SixofNine
    SixofNine

    Yes, you're missing the fact that before people get divorced, they are married. Before they get df'd, they are witnesses in good standing. Before someone comes to JWD, they wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole. Before you found those web pages, they'd been up for quite some time.

    Also, that Focus isn't focus, so finding focus or Kats doesn't matter in context of identifying Focus.

  • SpannerintheWorks
    SpannerintheWorks

    Danny,

    I think you may have found our focus........notice the reference to kats.........the picture focus uses here.

    Yes, he has a picture of a cheetah.

    Queeriouser and queeriouser......

    OK, I admit that the whole thing may be a complete smokescreen to hide Focus' (JWD) true identity. But I'm not convinced yet...

    Spanner

  • SpannerintheWorks
    SpannerintheWorks

    Six,

    Don't get me wrong, I understand what you say, but until there is an explanation for this, I will continue to wonder.

    So, can I deduce from what you have posted so far that:

    1. Simplesally (JWD)=Kats on the quoted web site http://home.socal.rr.com/crit

    2. That is an old web site, and that the Kats and Focus aka Crits on that site have susequently filed for divorced, etc. as stated by

    Simplesally on

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/forum/thread.aspx?id=31855&site=3

    3. Therefore, that makes any reverence towards the WBTS redundant?

    Spanner

    Edited by - SpannerintheWorks on 13 November 2002 3:52:16

  • wasasister
    wasasister

    What I do not understand is the seeming obsession with the identity of Focus on this or any other board. The poster has made a decision for whatever reason to remain annonymous.

    Why can't we respect that? I don't reveal my own personal information either. Does that make me a subject of investigation every time I post something others don't like or agree with? Does it matter at all whether Focus is/is not married?

    Wasa

  • SpannerintheWorks
    SpannerintheWorks

    Wasa,

    After being exposed to years of WBTS deception, I do not accept things on face value.

    In a nutshell, I want to know if the Focus who posts on this forum is the same Focus on http://home.socal.rr.com/crit

    So would others, BTW!

    All it takes is an explanation from Focus (JWD) or possibly Simplesally(JWD) aka Kats!

    Spanner

    Edited by - SpannerintheWorks on 13 November 2002 3:48:31

  • riz
    riz

    it's Kats, sherlock.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit