I am also labeling myself:
POTATO2015.RE.INCROYABLE.KARLMARX.BANANA.UNCLEFESTER
Best,
BOC
by LAWHFol 449 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
I am also labeling myself:
POTATO2015.RE.INCROYABLE.KARLMARX.BANANA.UNCLEFESTER
Best,
BOC
Semantics aside at some point with fallacy and all you have to say
Would you say the same if I said:
There is no evidence that God does not exist, therefor God must exists?
You would take issue with this fallacy would you not?
Absolutely. But that's because its utterly ridiculous lol
i feel like I'm taking cray pills over here.
You guys spend too much time on wikipedia reading fallacy definitions, I think they serve a fantastic purpose but are abused in these atheist bashing threads.
So if I use a fallacy to mock you for believing in fairies does that make them real because i used a fallacy????
Qcmbr you might be the forth or fifth person in this thread to ask that lol I know I did, cofty did, they love to stir it up for no reason
The Theists probably ran away when they realized it would be a slaughter :P
10 vs 1 Would not be a favorable fight ;)
freemindfade:
Semantics aside at some point with fallacy and all you have to say, fairies don't make sense. Not only do they not exist (which I cannot prove) it is ridiculous to believe in them
You guys spend too much time on wikipedia reading fallacy definitions, I think they serve a fantastic purpose but are abused in these atheist bashing threads.
So if I use a fallacy to mock you for believing in fairies does that make them real because i used a fallacy????
You fail to understand that this is a argument about Gnostic vs Agnostic. (certainty vs uncertainty)
We are not debating the existence of God, we are debating if you can be sure of his existence/non existence.
BOC,
POTATO2015.RE.INCROYABLE.KARLMARX.BANANA.UNCLEFESTER
I believe this IS crazy enough to be potato :)
Village Idiot
I have never read 'The coming of the fairies', but now that I know about it I will have to.
I'll say it again,
Atheism (which honestly atheists wouldn't have to call themselves but I believe the name had to be made for religious folks primitive minds to understand we don't buy their bullshit god) is the lack of belief in a god(s), not a CLAIM they don't exist. I feel comfortable saying YHWH most certainly does not seem to exist. As for some undefined god, or just things we don't understand yet, no one can know.
Maybe we are a computer program, maybe we were engineered by another alien race, or maybe we are a dream... i could make a list a mile long, none of it is founded in anything.
At the end of the OP he says "Until this Hypothesis is Disproven, classifying yourself as an "Atheist" is Un-Scientific."
Well i agree... I think atheism is not scientific, its making up a word to tell religiots that we don't believe in their god, so atheism is born from theology so they can define us, not define ourselves.
Muslim? Im an Allah atheist
JW? I'm a jehovah atheist
_Morpheus? I'm a Thor atheist... although the ice giants new light was very compelling!
I blame religion and bigoted morons for there even needing to be a word "Atheist". We are all born "atheist" until someone pumps bullshit into our heads. Should I have to make a list of all the gods I don't believe in? Or be like science and concentrate on defining our reality throw knowledge and not blinding superstition. Atheist, atheism, its not our word not our fault. The quagmire that comes with it is the fault of people who need to define a god they can't and those who dont believe!