undisfellowshipped,
: It is way, way more likely that the girls were taken as servants or slaves -- nothing is mentioned of child-rape in this Verse.
Then WHY did Moses say to take ONLY the virgin girls, not just girls in general, not wives (they were to be massacred), but ONLY virgin girls? Next, how did the Israelite soldiers determine WHICH girls were virgin and which girls weren't? Think about the test that they applied to obey Jehovah's servant Moses. Which finger did they use, and how did the little girls feel when they were felt-up by those barbarians? And after they stuck their fingers where they stuck their fingers, how did they know for SURE that the little girl they were about to butcher was a virgin or not? Think about that. Just how scientific was their method of determining virginity, or not? Who died who WAS a virgin in that massacre?
Now back to your answer which explains nothing: you assert that the girls were taken as servants or slaves. Don't you see the idiocy in that answer alone? Why would the God of love not only condone human slavery, but sanction it? That's idiotic and that god is idiotic. You Bible-thumpers seem to think that slavery in ancient times was not a big deal because everyone else did it. But the Israelites were NOT everyone else. They were God's chosen people. That being the case then it is logical to say that Jehovah was a slave-promoting God. Period. That makes Jehovah a major asshole for not having his own chosen people set a great example for all their neighbors.
The soldiers SPARED some women and girls in Num. 31! But Moses said NO! Kill them ALL, EXCEPT for the virgin little girls. Read it again. For your assertion to be valid, virginity or not had nothing to do with it: Moses just wanted female slaves. But that's not what happened.
Moses made it quite clear to kill all females BUT the virgin girls. Since the average age of marriage at that time for girls was 12 years old, then Moses made it perfectly clear that he wanted little girls spared. Now tell us all, would an 11 year-old girl be a better slave than say a 25 year old woman? If so, please explain. Now would an 11 year-old VIRGIN girl be a better slave and say another 11 year-old NON-virgin girl? Explain your answer.
Sex-slaves is still the only logical answer. I've read that portion of the Bible a dozen times and I can come to no other conclusion. If you weren't so blind and trying so hard to make bullshit into anything but bullshit, you would have to agree.
Farkel
Edited by - Farkel on 25 November 2002 1:47:17