You obviously didn't bother to read my post, I thought I gave a pretty good explanation of why. I have to agree with everyone else, you are lazy and this thread is over, I won't waste any more time on it.
Won't get fooled again ...Moon Landing.
by The Rebel 579 Replies latest jw friends
-
-
The Rebel
Witness My Fury, thank you for the link and the transcript, which I had bothered to read before I posted my question. It was infact the reason I raised the question. And If you had bothered to read the link you would see it doesn't answer my question.
My question still remains unanswered:-
WHY did Bush not explain WHY it would take 15 years with 21st tecnology to return to the moon, when it only took 8 years to accomplish this achievement with 1960s tecnology?
The Rebel.
-
The Rebel
Thanks Viv, your images don't require answering a question, nor do they require deeper meaning, and therefore you can escape answering the puzzle of deeper meaning which my question challenged you . I do believe you can't answer my question.
WHY did Bush, NOT explain WHY it would take 15 years with 21st century tecnology to return to the moon, when it only took 8 years to accomplish this achievement with 1960s tecnology?
Vivs answer by return, another image of man pooping. Congratulations.
The Rebel.
-
Simon
Viviane: I've removed your images - they are not appreciated. If you don't want to discuss the topic then don't post on the thread.
Same goes for everyone else - you discuss the TOPIC, don't make endless insults.
-
The Rebel
Ceders I appreciate your post.What I don't understand from your comment is how with my understanding of pre-emtion and monentary speculation plus advanced tecnology, why even with a reduced budget of Billions of dollars this is not enough for America to have returned to the moon.
The Rebel
-
Viviane
Thanks Viv, your images don't require answering a question, nor do they require deeper meaning, and therefore you can escape answering the puzzle of deeper meaning which my question challenged you . I do believe you can't answer my question.
Of course I can. I simply choose, again, to not do your research or critical thinking for you. That's become something of a theme on this thread of ever shifting topic. You ask an easily answered question, refuse to do even basic research, then complain when others won't do it for you, even after a kinder soul actually does the research for you and you don't bother to attempt to understand it.
-
Viviane
Viviane: I've removed your images - they are not appreciated. If you don't want to discuss the topic then don't post on the thread.
Understood, although I have to confess at this point I am unclear what the topic is. Whether or not the moon landing happened is the topic of the thread, evidence was presented in favor of that man having landed on the moon. Counter-evidence was not presented because there is none.
Now the topic seems to be whatever Rebel doesn't doesn't bother to research about the moon, NASA, the space program, etc.
Rebel, would you mind clarifying what the topic is at this point?
-
bradford
Who cares? Believe what you want - except what the JWs are teaching.
-
Viviane
Who cares? Believe what you want - except what the JWs are teaching.
Because this type of thinking is the same type of thinking that leads to anti-vaccination crusades. It's a symptom of a lack of critical thinking and reasoning skills, a demonstration of an inability to evaluate evidence and recognize reality. It hurts us all.
-
EndofMysteries
I don't have time to read 50 pages of replies to see if anybody said what I'm about to say but here is my 2 cents.....
I did see one reply mention radiation and how humans couldn't survive. Recently, the past year, there were articles and news stories about some sort of force field (NOT the magnetic field), that circles Earth but goes out 8,000 miles which would supposedly protect from killer electrons. Since the moon is beyond this, could lead credibility to it not have happening. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/01/earth-invisible-force-field_n_6245942.html
Just because one can see man made objects on the moon doesn't mean man was on it. We have objects on mars now, but no men on mars.
I do wonder how they so quickly were able to put man on the moon so long ago yet a year or 2 ago I read USA wanted to do it again but it would take at least 11 years. If we had already done it, why would it take so long to do it again?
The moon conspiracy theory though doesn't really change anything though whether man was on it or not.