Spinning off from what wednesday said about making an issue in the press about your husband being kicked out of his church for going off to defend his country...
It seems to me that he could make a big stink to have his df'ing reversed, on the grounds that he had already disassociated himself by his actions (i.e., joining the military). He might want to have his attorney send a letter to the elders (timed to arrive right after the df'ing announcement) demanding that they publicly rescind the df'ing and threatening suit if they don't. After all, at the time the allegations of apostasy arose, he was, under Watchtower doctrine, no longer a member of their group. Courts usually won't mess with internal religious affairs, but they might do so if a person's reputation was harmed by a religious group's violating its own rules.
You would still want to send out your letter, of course, explaining all of the above. Imagine the reaction of the congregation members when they get a letter from an "apostate" making such claims, and then the claims are vindicated by the rescinding of the df'ing! Even better, you might say in your letter something to the effect that, because of the unchristian conduct of the elders, your husband wants no further part of this organization.That way, when the disassociation is announced (after the df'ing is reversed), they might well perceive it as his reaction to the elders' actions, and not over the military issue.
I would also think that the press might be very interested in a scenario such as I've described. In any event, the circuit overseer is bound to be less than pleased by the turmoil it causes. Just a thought.
Edited by - NeonMadman on 9 December 2002 9:46:53