JH,
What's your deal? One of your other posts listed you as being from Israel, now this one says Kuwait.
Pretty funny.
ha ha ha.
Anyways...wow..these articles are interesting. Some of it I believe....some of it I'm skeptical. But yeah...Bush knew about 9/11 beforehand, there's just too much evidence that supports it.
My first reaction the day it happened is how a plane destined for California could turn around while flying over Ohio, head back towards NYC and ram into the WTC building without air traffic catching it and alerting the authorities. They would've been communicating with that plane soon after it veered off of course. And then after the two planes hit the WTC, another plane hits the Pentagon?! C'mon!!! Surely the Air Force would have been on high alert and air traffic would've alerted them there was another plane off of course. Then Bush makes the statement that "when he saw the first plane hit.." all his Yale intellect evidently CHOKED on him there, huh?! That joker knew, and I hope the world will finally wake up and understand this and deal with him accordingly. Freaking CROOKS - him and his dad...
As to the rest of this....ehhhhhh...I'll believe it when I see it.
I must admit, reading the section about NESERA taking office and declaring "peace" sent a chill down my spine.
Bendrr,
You say no new world order, eh? What do you base that on? How can you convince me that it doesn't exist, because you simply stating that holds no water whatsoever. Me reading the following article puts some pretty convincing thoughts in my head:
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/
The NWO global conspirators manifest their agenda through the skillful manipulation of human emotions, especially fear. In the past centuries, they have repeatedly utilized a contrivance that NWO researcher and author David Icke has characterized in his latest book, The Biggest Secret, as Problem, Reaction, and Solution.
The technique is as follows: Illuminati strategists create the Problem- by funding , assembling, and training an "opposition" group to stimulate turmoil in an established political power (sovereign country, region, continent, etc.) that they wish to impinge upon and thus create opposing factions in a conflict that the Illuminati themselves maneuvered into existence. In recent decades, so called "opposition" groups are usually identified in the media as 'freedom fighters' or 'liberators' (recently the KLA-Kosovo Liberation Army).
At the same time, the leader of the established political power where the conflict is being orchestrated is demonized and, on cue, referred to as 'another Hitler' (take your pick: Saddam Hussein, Milosevic, Kadaffi, etc.). The 'freedom fighters' are not infrequently assembled from a local criminal element (i.e. KLA, drug traffickers). In the spirit of true Machiavellian deceit, the same NWO strategists are equally involved in covertly arming and advising the leader of the established power as well (the Illuminati always profits from any armed conflict by loaning money, arming, and supplying all parties involved in a war).
The conflict is drawn to the world stage by the controlled media outlets with a barrage of photos and video tape reports of horrific and bloody atrocities suffered by innocent civilians. The cry goes up "Something has to be done!" And That is the desired Reaction (note: the same technique is presently being used to bring about gun control in the United States).
The NWO puppeteers then provide the Solution by sending in UN 'Peace Keepers' (Bosnia) or a UN 'Coalition Force' (Gulf War) or NATO Bombers and then ground troops (Kosovo). Once installed, the 'peace keepers' never leave (Bosnia, Kosovo). The idea is to have NWO controlled ground troops in all major countries or strategic areas where significant resistance to the New World Order takeover is likely to be encountered.
Not to say I totally believe in all of the theories of the Illumanati, but still one must recognize that the USA has a HUGE military presence throughout the world, so one could reasonably conclude that they are in a position to act on such a "ridiculous conspiracy theory" if they wanted to. Why wouldn't they? What president alive today would not want to control the world if he had the power and means to do so?
I'd love to hear your convincing arguments because I view these conspiracy theories as possible truths that could sooner or later come to surface, and I don't want to be the blind one caught off guard and totally unprepared for what may lay ahead.
