Cynicus & gita,
thanks, you've both helped me to understand this a little better.
Dan, shouldn't-have-slept-through-algebra-class class
by DanTheMan 21 Replies latest jw friends
Cynicus & gita,
thanks, you've both helped me to understand this a little better.
Dan, shouldn't-have-slept-through-algebra-class class
You are thinking liner; cause then effect. The arrow is in the target...effect, then the cause, reaction to the drawn string. Your reference frame has to make sense of the effect, so you see thing sequentially. Einstein could never get behind Quanta. It is not intuitive. You can not know where an object is and where it is going at the same time. You can know where it has been and where it might go. Want some light reading? Check out the Einstein/Bohr debates: Albert Einstien: Philosopher-Scientist (New York:Tudor,1949). Maverick