Sea Breeze: You have to borrow your assumption from a biblical worldview in order to even argue against it.
You have claimed this many times, but never demonstrated it. In other words, my god is better than yours.
@TonusOH: Your assumption about the reliability of logic is what I am questioning. If atheists assume accidental explosions, unguided chance, and chaotic chemical reactions explain of the origins of logic, why do they view logic as trustworty?
It is a ligitimate question which flows directly from atheist assumptions... not mine. No strawman there.
So far you've guessed because they work. Which I pointed out as the logical fallacy of irrelevant thesis. You've also suggested logic is produced by our minds. But, that doesn't make any sense because we all have different brain chemistry, IQ's, experiences etc.
Anything else?
So far, it is inconsistent. When a worldview is inconsistent it is very likely to be untrue.
@Jeffro
Sigh. No. You’re wrong.
From NASA:
"Uranus is also one of just two planets that rotate in the opposite direction than most of the planets. Venus is the other".