WoMD ... so where are they?

by Simon 865 Replies latest social current

  • searchfothetruth
    searchfothetruth

    What the hell are you babbling on about?

    I haven't even mentioned Michael Moore!

    It doesn't matter what any-one post's, if you don't agree with it, they are all liberal morons!

    Maybe you need to look in the mirror and read your last post to yourself, but you'll probably disagree with your reflection!

  • Jayson
    Jayson

    21-Apr-03 16:09 Thread Conspiracy Theory or Conspiracy Fact?


    Search says;


    "I get my facts from lots of different places.

    Michael Moore is very sarcastic and too pro Democratic party to be totally believed but most of what he says checks out.

    I've got to say tho' 'Bowling for Columbine' is one of the best documentary's i've ever seen."


    Nice come back about looking in the mirror it made me laugh.

  • ThiChi
    ThiChi

    News flsah!

    Dateline:Washington DC: May 16, 1 2003

    Newsflash: The Search is Over, Massive piles of WMD's Found in Iraq

    US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld held a news conference today to
    announce that teams of US inspectors had found numerous Weapons of
    Minimum Destruction(WMD), all over the countryside of Iraq.

    "We are horrified to report," Rumsfeld told a breathless Washington
    press corps, "that we found piles of these WMD's in all areas we went in
    the country. Machine guns, AK 47's and rocket propelled grenades are
    heaped everywhere. These weapons are capable of causing terrible
    injuries, even death, when they used against humans and other living
    things."

    "These discoveries", Rumsfeld continued, "should put to rest all the
    carping about our reasons for going to war with Iraq.

    Asked by one skeptical journalist if he didn't mean to say "Weapons of
    Mass Destruction", Rumsfeld responded testily, "Heavens no, what do you
    think we are, barbarians? It's unthinkable that any country would use
    weapons of mass destruction. We never accused Iraq of any such thing.
    Weapons of minimum destruction are justification enough to take strong
    action against any regime that would dare employ them."

    From the back of the room, another reporter asked Rumsfeld if all the
    videotapes and articles quoting news conferences and interviews with US
    officials where Iraq was accused of possessing weapons of mass
    destruction were fabrications. "Absolutely," Rumsfeld responded, "the
    enemies of freedom have penetrated the very fabric of our news media,
    with their lies and distortions. As part of our war on terrorism, we
    will deal with this as well. By the way, on what floor of the hotel is
    your news organization located?"

    When another reporter pointed out that most countries in the world had
    weapons of minimum destruction as a basic part of their arsenal,
    Rumsfeld said "We are compiling as list of malefactor countries now.
    Once the Pentagon has run the list through their highly sophisticated
    sorting program "Others In Line"(OIL), we will announce shortly the top
    ten transgressors and a timetable for troop deployment."

    Hahaaahahaha!
    --

  • ThiChi
  • Realist
    Realist

    thichi,

    are you allright??

    have you been turned to the good side of the force???

  • searchfothetruth
    searchfothetruth

    Bloody Hell, Jayson, I thought you were talking about this thread,

    I mentioned Michael Moore weeks ago and then you start babbling on about it again...did you have a time lapse or something

    ThiChi,

    We've had similar reports for weeks and they have all been false and never mentioned again, just to keep the gullible, like you, from thinking that they have found something.

    You two are really something else. You never comment on the posts of others except to belittle or criticise. TRY READING.

  • dubla
    dubla

    search-

    wow, the pot calling the kettle black...this is hilarious:

    We've had similar reports for weeks and they have all been false and never mentioned again, just to keep the gullible, like you, from thinking that they have found something.

    You two are really something else. You never comment on the posts of others except to belittle or criticise. TRY READING.

    "try reading"? lol, you didnt even take the time to read thichis post (probably just the headline), because if you had youd have realized it was complete satire! how in the world did you call someone out and show your ass in the same two sentences? thats an accomplishment.......sorry, just had to point that out before it gets edited.

    aa

  • Realist
    Realist

    question to all native english speakers....what does [sic] stand for?

  • searchfothetruth
    searchfothetruth

    I think it's when you have to turn away and vomit at some of the crap that gets posted!

  • Realist
    Realist

    LOL

    but no i don'T think so...is it possible that it stands for misspelling or something like that? (its in the text of the michael moore card)

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit