Should You Be Required To Wear A Coronavirus Mask?

by minimus 28 Replies latest jw friends

  • WTWizard
    WTWizard

    Most masks do little to protect you from getting the virus (or, for that matter, any other cold or flu virus). At best, they might help prevent one from spreading it. Which will do little good if someone touches something and someone else touches the same item and then has no soap and water or hand sanitizer. And, they will cause worse problems in hot, muggy weather. Besides, what about molds and fungi that grow inside the mask? That is worse than the coronavirus, with many strains of molds capable of causing lasting lung damage that spreads through the whole body if one is in prolonged contact with them.

    There are masks that do offer better protection. Usually, they are tight fitting, restrict your breathing, and cost an arm and a leg plus are hard to find. I suggest reserving those masks for those who are highly vulnerable and those who must work in close contact with people that are at high risk of carrying this, or some even worse, disease. And, what about wearing masks to protect against tuberculosis, which is far worse?

    What I see is that this is not just about health. They are going to keep this mask requirement until a vaccine (and a microchip to prove you had it) becomes available. You will then need that vaccine and the RFID chip to be able to enter any public place or to work. We will have 5G to connect those chips to your life, making sure we have total compliance with the dreaded Noahide Laws (which, to me, make coronavirus seem like a mosquito bite). We will have the social scores common in China, but far worse--and it will be "Off with your head!" if you break one of the 7 laws in that piece of rubbish. Obviously, once the vaccine is in place, you will still need the mask until you have the vaccination--and, after the transition period, the mask will no longer be "enough". You need the shot and the chip.

    And, anyone smart enough to ask "Why don't we have mandatory vaccinations with RFID chips for things like Hepatitis B, tuberculosis, and typhus?" will be among the first to get their heads chopped off. (Under Noahide laws against blasphemy.)

  • Simon
    Simon
    They even have said NOT to use a real (95) version mask since they want those used by the professionals.

    They only said that because they botched ensuring that they had sufficient supplies. They were happy to sacrifice lives rather than admit they didn't do their job. Think about that.

    I know the laws say in most places that you shouldn't have your crotch exposed in public but I wouldn't expect the government to buy me a pair of pants.

    That would work as an analogy if pants weren't in plentiful supply and lots of people didn't already have them.

  • minimus
    minimus

    If we are required to put a “mask” on , then a provision should be made to make them readily available. If we are required to wear gloves before we enter a building, then we should have gloves provided to us. If we are supposed to disinfect our hands when we enter or exit a store, the disinfectant should be made freely available to us.

  • Tahoe
    Tahoe

    Taken from RubaDub’s private collection


  • minimus
    minimus

    Good enough ! They would have a law saying you can’t come into the public domain with underwear over your face.

  • RubaDub
    RubaDub

    Min ...

    It works, believe me. I'm sure some people were smiling when I have gone to the food store when I wear mine. Problem is that it is hard to see any reactions since other people are wearing masks too ... lol.

    Rub a Dub

  • minimus
    minimus

    Why are your masks stained?? Is that nicotine or something else??

  • RubaDub
    RubaDub

    It just adds to the ambiance.

    Rub a Dub

  • careful
    careful

    I hope MMM's pics did not hijack the thread, but they are EXCELLENT (Tahoe's too). Thanks so much. We can all use some humour in this mess.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit