AlanF,
I have a xerox of the court documents and it's true that the age recorded is as you say. But I see it (as Magnani does also) that it could likely to be a typo. It wasn't in a portion of the records that was to have any bearing on the case and could easily have been glossed over, rendered moot, or stipulated by the attorneys. My documents don't show that Emily was sworn in, does anyone know her age?
If not a typo, it makes for an even more curious/interesting story about why Russell chose to add the details that no one knew her age exactly, only that she was still wearing short dresses (as young girls did) and that Russell says he became more conscious of his wife's potential jealousies when she was ready to wear long dresses. I have merely gathered that these extra details and the context made a typo seem likely.
Who killed Rose's brother? Does anyone know how Rose Ball's brother died?. He was ostensibly of about the same age, and was also with the Russell's for a time. Russell indicated that he died before 1894, and that this was a factor in the "comforting" that Rose needed. (If this were a movie, I know what Oliver Stone would do with that little detail.)
Funny how the yearbook in 1975 pretty much uses the argument: 'Well it's obvious Russell didn't do anything immoral, after all, Rose couldn't have been more than 15 years old at the time.' Today, I think they'd think twice about that argument. They might prefer the older age considering recent media exposure.
Perhaps someone has already looked through Allegheny's local papers for the years in question. Also curious about the "slander" in the paper Inter-Ocean Daily around April 1906. Does anyone have it?
Gamaliel