Dinosaur Soft Tissue

by Sea Breeze 35 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

• 

  Sea Breeze

  Yes, some are real, the real ones depict fish and flowers

  @Anony Mous: How could there not be controversy over something this big? It is interesting that so many professionals with careers and educations to defend believe the Ica stones with dinosaurs are real. Here's a list of Pro and Con arguments.
  
  But, this is only a subset of historical global dinosaur art in general. Which itself is a subset of the available evidence for a young earth.

  The 10 Best Evidences from Science that Confirm a Young Earth

  1. Very Little Sediment on the Seafloor

  For Additional Information:

  • The Sands of Time: A Biblical Model of Deep Sea-Floor Sedimentation
  • The Sands of Time: A Biblical Model of Deep Sea-Floor Sedimentation
  • “Sea Salt, Erosion, and Sediments” from Earth’s Catastrophic Past1

  2. Bent Rock Layers

  For Additional Information:

  • Folded Rock Layers
  • “Soft-Sediment Deformation Features” from Earth’s Catastrophic Past2
  • “Megasequences of North America” from Earth’s Catastrophic Past3

  3. Soft Tissue in Fossils

  For Additional Information:

  • Two: Those Not-So-Dry Bones
  • More Soft Tissue in “Old” Fossils

  4. Faint Sun Paradox

  For Additional Information:

  • The Young Faint Sun Paradox and the Age of the Solar System

  5. Rapidly Decaying Magnetic Field

  For Additional Information:

  • The Earth’s Magnetic Field Is Young
  • The Earth’s Magnetic Field and the Age of the Earth
  • “The Earth’s Magnetic Field” from Earth’s Catastrophic Past4

  6. Helium in Radioactive Rocks

  For Additional Information:

  • Helium Diffusion Rates Support Accelerated Nuclear Decay
  • Young Helium Diffusion Age of Zircons Supports Accelerated Nuclear Decay
  • The Age of the Earth’s Atmosphere Estimated by its Helium Content
  • “Helium in Rocks and in the Atmosphere” from Earth’s Catastrophic Past5

  7. Carbon-14 in Fossils, Coal, and Diamonds

  For Additional Information:

  • Carbon-14 in Fossils and Diamonds
  • Carbon-14 Evidence for a Recent Global Flood and a Young Earth
  • Measurable 14C in Fossilized Organic Materials: Confirming the Young Earth Creation-Flood Model
  • “The Pitfalls in the Radioactive Dating Methods—The Radiocarbon Dating Method” from Earth’s Catastrophic Past6
  • “Carbon-14 Dating” from Thousands . . . not Billions7

  8. Short-Lived Comets

  For Additional Information:

  • Comets and the Age of the Solar System
  • Kuiper Belt Objects: Solution to Short-Period Comets?
  • More Problems for the ‘Oort Comet Cloud’

  9. Very Little Salt in the Sea

  For Additional Information:

  • The Sea’s Missing Salt: A Dilemma for Evolutionists
  • “Sea Salt, Erosion, and Sediments” from Earth’s Catastrophic Past8

  10. DNA in “Ancient” Bacteria

  For Additional Information:

  • Bacterial Life in Ancient Salt
• 

  Balaamsass2

  Who is the source of this YouTube site?

  Not an accredited "Dr." of geology, biology, or Paleontology.

  It is folly to leave Watchtower and its fake "experts," like Fred Franz, to grab onto new fakes.
• 

  Sea Breeze

  It turns out that Human Footprints in the Carboniferous messes up the deep time for secularists as well:

  

  Richard Dawkins said, authenticated evidence of humans in the Carboniferous would “blow the theory of evolution out of the water.” (Dawkins, Free Inquiry, vol. 21, no. 4, 2001.)

  One such fossil footprint - pictured above - was discovered by the head of department at Berea college in Kentucky. It is of a human-like track left in sandstone of the Upper Carboniferous Period.

  Numerous scientists have investigated these tracks and concluded that they are genuine (even going so far as to count the sand grains under magnification to ensure that it was compressed at the bottom rather than carved).

  In Scientific American, geologist Albert G. Ingalls writes, “If man, or even his ape ancestors, or even that ape ancestor’s early mammalian ancestor, existed as far back as the Carboniferous Period in any shape, then the whole science of geology is so completely wrong that all the geologists will resign their jobs and take up truck driving.

  "Hence, for the present at least, science rejects the attractive explanation that man made these mysterious prints in the mud of the Carboniferous with his feet.” Ingalls suggested that they were made by some unidentified amphibian.

  But a human-sized Carboniferous amphibian is just about as problematic for evolutionary timetables as humans in that era!
  
  Another example of "believe what I say, not what you see".
• 

  Touchofgrey

  Humans didn't exist in the carboniferous period.

  You should post the article regarding your claim, so that we can read what Dawkins actually said.
• 

  Sea Breeze

  Here's a few more images of the footprints from the Carboniferous Pennsylvania Sandstone in which the footprint set above were found.

  Like dinosaur soft tissue, human footprints don't seem to be limited by supposed geologic age.

  

  

  

  Mmmm
• 

  Touchofgrey

  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleontology_in_Pennsylvania

  Humans didn't exist during this time period.