I don’t envy Marvin the task of debating with someone that literally needs to be educated at every turn.
How do you discuss the difference between consumption and transplantation/transfusion with someone who doesn’t understand that protein catabolization performed by the immune system is in many ways, incomparable with that performed by the digestive system?
How do you discuss the language of the Decree with someone who doesn’t understand that you can’t simply plug in the definition of apachesthai that most suits your theology and still have an accurate translation? Could it be that there was a linguistic reason why even the Witnesses dropped the rendering “keep free from” around 1970?
How do you discuss the question of blood fractions with someone that doesn’t realize that only one plasma fraction (gamma globulin) crosses as the result of an active transport mechanism and that all other blood fractions and components cross simply because no containment system is perfect?
How do you discuss questions of legality with someone that doesn’t understand that life over property is a basic tenant of both the laws of God and man?
How do you discuss an alleged prohibition on the “use” of blood with someone who sees nothing inconsistent about selectively opening a door he had already emphatically declared to be shut? Or are Witnesses prohibited from working in the healthcare industry altogether?
Marvin --- You’re a better man than I am gunga din!
Tom