Letter from a friend in Iraq

by Yerusalyim 117 Replies latest social current

  • expatbrit
    expatbrit

    The Real Iraq
    By Amir Taheri
    New York Post | July 18, 2003

    Open up almost any American or European publication these days, and you'll be bombarded with grim news about "horrific" conditions in Iraq - and America's "poor handling" of the post-war reconstruction effort. All of which, it is claimed, is made all the more tragic - because President Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair maliciously exaggerated the threat from Iraq. They may have won the war, but they're losing they peace.

    Author and Middle East expert Amir Taheri spent several days on the ground in Iraq last week and found reality to be starkly different from what is so ubiquitously reported.

    Here is a first-hand account of an Iraq that is rapidly moving forward in nearly every aspect of life - political, economic and cultural. And a people that, while understandably skeptical after decades of tyranny, is nonetheless hopeful - and grateful for their liberation.

    ---- New York Post Editors

    BAGHDAD, IRAQ

    'THE Iraqi Intifada!"

    This is the cover story offered by Al- Watan Al-Arabi, a pro-Saddam Hussein weekly published in Paris. It finds an echo in the latest issue of America's Time magazine, which paints a bleak prospect for the newly liberated country. The daily Al Quds, another pro-Saddam paper, quotes from The Washington Post in support of its claim that "a popular war of resistance" is growing in Iraq. Some newspapers in the United States, Britain and "old Europe" go further by claiming that Iraq has become a "quagmire" or "another Vietnam." The Parisian daily Le Monde prefers the term "engrenage," which is both more chic and French.

    This chorus wants us to believe that most Iraqis regret the ancien regime, and are ready to kill and die to expel their liberators.


    Sorry, guys, this is not the case.


    Neither the wishful thinking of part of the Arab media, long in the pay of Saddam, nor the visceral dislike of part of the Western media for George W. Bush and Tony Blair changes the facts on the ground in Iraq.


    ONE fact is that a visitor to Iraq these days never finds anyone who wants Saddam back.


    There are many complaints, mostly in Baghdad, about lack of security and power cuts. There is anxiety about the future at a time that middle-class unemployment is estimated at 40 percent. Iraqis also wonder why it is that the coalition does not communicate with them more effectively. That does not mean that there is popular support for violent action against the coalition.


    Another fact is that the violence we have witnessed, especially against American troops, in the past six weeks is limited to less than 1 percent of the Iraqi territory, in the so-called "Sunni Triangle," which includes parts of Baghdad.


    Elsewhere, the coalition presence is either accepted as a fact of life or welcomed. On the 4th of July some shops and private homes in various parts of Iraq, including the Kurdish areas and cities in the Shiite heartland, put up the star-spangled flag as a show of gratitude to the United States.


    "We see our liberation as the start of a friendship with the U.S. and the U.K. that should last a thousand years," says Khalid Kishtaini, one of Iraq's leading novelists. "The U.S. and the U.K. showed that a friend in need is a friend indeed. Nothing can change that."


    In the early days of the liberation, some mosque preachers tested the waters by speaking against "occupation." They soon realized that their congregations had a different idea. Today, the main theme in sermons at the mosques is about a partnership between the Iraqi people and the coalition to rebuild the war-shattered country and put it on the path of democracy.


    Even the radical Shiite cleric Muqtada Sadr now says that "some good" could come out of the coalition's presence in Iraq. "The coalition must help us stabilize the situation," he says. "The healing period that we need would not be possible if we are suddenly left alone."


    Yet another fact is that all 67 of Iraq's cities and 85 percent of the smaller towns now have fully functioning municipalities. Several ministries, including that of health and education, have also managed to get parts of their operations going again. The petroleum industry, too, is being revived with plans to produce up to 2.8 million barrels of crude oil a day before the year is out.


    To be sure, life in Iraq today is no bed of roses. But don't forget that this is an immediate post-war situation. There is no famine - in fact, the bazaars are more replenished with food than ever since the late 1970s - while food prices, having jumped in the first weeks after liberation, are now lower than they were in the last years of Saddam's rule.


    MOST hospitals are functioning again with essential medical supplies trickling in for the first time since 1999. Also, some 85 percent of primary and secondary schools and all but two of the nation's universities have reopened with a full turnout of pupils and teachers.


    The difference is that there no longer are any mukahebrat (secret police) agents roaming the campuses and sitting at the back of classrooms to make sure lecturers and students do not discuss forbidden topics. Nor are the students required to start every day with a solemn oath of allegiance to the dictator.


    There has been no mass exodus anywhere in Iraq. On the contrary, many Iraqis, driven out of their homes by Saddam, are returning to their towns and villages.


    Their return has given the building industry, moribund in the last years of Saddam, a boost. Iraqi exiles and refugees abroad are also coming home, many from Iran and Turkey. Last month alone the Iranian Red Crescent recorded the repatriation of more than 10,000 Iraqis, mostly Kurds and Shiites.


    In Iraq today there are no "displaced persons," no uprooted communities and no long lines of war victims in search of a safe haven.


    FOR the first time in almost 50 years there are also no political prisoners, no executions, no torture and no limit on freedom of expression. Iraq today is the only Muslim country where all shades of opinion - from the extremist Islamists of the Hezbollah to Stalinists, and passing by liberals, socialists, Arab nationalists and moderate Islamists - have full freedom to compete in an open market of ideas. Better still, all are now represented in the newly created Governing Assembly (Majlis al-Hukum). Iraq is also the only Muslim country where more than 100 newspapers and weeklies, representing all shades of opinion, appear without a police permit and are subjected to no censorship.


    Much is made of power cuts, especially in Baghdad. But this is partly due to a 30 percent seasonal increase in demand because of air-conditioning use in temperatures that reach 115 degrees. In other cities - for example, Basra - the country's second-most populous urban center, more electricity is used than at any time under Saddam Hussein.


    A stroll in the open-air book markets of the Rashid Street reveals that thousands of books, blacklisted and banned under Saddam Hussein, are now available for sale. Among the banned authors were almost all of Iraq's best writers and poets, whom many young Iraqis discover for the first time. Stalls, offering video and audiotapes for sale, are appearing in Baghdad and other major cities, again giving Iraqis access to a forbidden cultural universe.


    The flower stalls along the Tigris are also making a comeback.


    "Business is good," says Hashem Yassin, one florist. "In the past, we sold a lot of flowers for funerals and placement on tombs. Now we sell for weddings, birthday parties and gifts of friendship."


    The free-market economy is making its first inroads into Iraq's socialistic system in a number of small ways. Hundreds of hawkers are offering a variety of imported goods and making brisk business by selling soft drinks, often bottled in Iran, and biscuits and chewing gums from Turkey.


    Some teahouses, in competition to attract clients, offer satellite television as an additional attraction. Every evening people pack the teahouses to watch, and zap and discuss, what they have seen in an atmosphere of freedom unknown under Saddam. It may be hard for Westerners to understand the Iraqis' exhilaration at being able to watch television of their choice.


    But this is a country where, under Saddam, people could be condemned as spies and hanged for owning a satellite dish.


    Another symbol of newly won freedom is the multiplication of cellular and satellite phones. Most belong to returning exiles. But their appearance is reassuring to many Iraqis. Under Saddam, their illegal possession could carry the death penalty.


    The portrayal of Baghdad as an oriental version of the Far West in Hollywood Westerns misses the point. It ignores the fact that life is creeping back to normal, that weddings, always popular in summer, are being celebrated again, often with traditional tribal ostentation. The first rock concert since the war, offered by a boys' band, has already taken place, and Iraq's National Football (soccer) Squad has resumed training under a German coach.


    THERE are two Iraqs today: One as portrayed by those in America and Europe who wish to use it as a means of damaging Bush and Blair, and the other as it really exists, home to 24 million people with many hopes and aspirations and, naturally, some anxiety about the future.


    "After we have aired our grievances we remember the essential point: Saddam is gone," says Mohsen Saleh, a geologist in Baghdad. "A man who is cured of cancer does not complain about a common cold."

  • Simon
    Simon

    Yerusalyim

    The technique of attibuting any cock-up to the enemy and claiming that nothing ever goes wrong is both old and worn and unbelievable. The staory of the market bombing has many parallels with a conflict involving either Italy or Spain (I'll lookup the details) where a town was bombarded. The encircling army denied they caused some deaths until pieces of a bomb fragment were recovered ... just as bits with "made in the USA" were found in the market in Bhagdad (there are other similarities as well).

    Are we really to believe that no mistakes were made when targetting things? That no missiles went astray? We know that some went so far astray that they fell on Turkey, but we're expected to believe that they couldn't go yards or kilometers astray? Sorry, I don't buy it.

    No Jayson, I am not obsessive with this issue (a dismissive put-down to try and shut me up?)

    I am not picking on individual statements but looking at the big picture that was painted and what was portrayed. There are many statements and threads that come untangled the more you pick at them. The whole garment just doesn't stay together once you start tugging at bits of it.

    Just as in the UK, the support for the war was not based on any single sentance or statement but on the whole picture that was painted with snippets here and dossiers there. They have all turned out to be dodgy and contrived so I value the backing that the war got very little - the people who voted for it were (I hope) doing what they thought was right but have since begun to ask questions knowing that they too were decieved like the rest of us (well, some of us).

    Do you want me to point to the threads where I complained about the human suffering before the war due to the USA/UK led sanctions against Iraq that did nothing but hurt common people and children? No, of course not. It suits your viewpoint to see me as a naysayer and someone who only spoke out against the war and had no opinion before that. The fact is, I was saying things were being done wrong before and I have stuck to what I believe. I've seen nothing to convince me that Bush et al are at all interested in the little people or doing anything for them.

    We are paying the price in Iraq now for the mistakes of 30 years ago and in 30 years time, we will be paying for the mistakes of today. Our leaders learn nothing from past mistakes and only have the same short-sightedness as their predecessors.

    It will only stop when WE stop. The trouble in the middle east (and most other places) is US ... we are the bad guys! We are the ones that create the Saddams, the Osamas, the Pinochets, the [insert puppet dictator]s. That is why the people who suffer because of them resent US. Our solution? ... "we need to put a new guy in".

    Expatbrit.

    You are making the mistake that "anti-Saddam" = "pro-Western". This is the sort of simplistic reasoning that Bush and his advisors seemed to base their campaign on - "hey, we just turn up and they'll all be on our side". It doesn't. It's more like "anti-Saddam" = "anti-Western gits who set the guy up and left us to suffer and are now in our face".

    Just because they are glad Saddam is gone doesn't mean they want us there. I think they'd rather get on with things themselves and decide their own destiny. The only reason they are in the mess they are in now is because of western interference in the past.

  • RAYZORBLADE
    RAYZORBLADE

    I've read through the thread, and of course, as expected, it inspires many passionate replies. No surprise!

    Most of the items listed, quoted and referred to, have been shared before.

    My motto: Question Everything

  • Aztec
    Aztec

    Here we go again..........

    It's far too beautiful outside for me to sit here and butt heads with thickheaded folks. Yeru and dubla, you continue to confound me with your unwavering, stubborn belief that you are right. Always right. I am willing to change my opinion on things when I feel I am in error. Are either of you? I'll not waste my time debating this with you as it's pointless. I do hold out hope for Expat though. He far too bright and reasonable to align himself with the dark side forever. I'll convert him yet!

    ~Aztec

  • Jayson
    Jayson

    Well Simon I don't see the time yet of my edit but I included myself in the "obessive-ness class" and I said you are not the "worst by far in my opinion" so I don't see how you see this a put down to you personally. It wasn't. And I can't shut you up as this is your site. If that word insults you I am sorry and will not use it again.

    It will only stop when WE stop. The trouble in the middle east (and most other places) is US ... we are the bad guys! We are the ones that create the Saddams, the Osamas, the Pinochets, the [insert puppet dictator]s. That is why the people who suffer because of them resent US.

    I am not sure if you were saying "US" or the "U.S." But either way it would be great if it were that simple. I think one thing you do not understand about me is that I have said several times on this topic "There Are No Angels."

    There is an Iraqi Constitution being drafted. That is a good start to a better future for the Iraqi people. Human rights globally, Civil Rights Nationally, these are the things to work for and support. (At least for me that is on this topic)

    Now as for the rest Az- is right it is to nice to do this today. And it is to nice for book work which I have been doing. Time for a bike ride. Thanks for the push Az.

  • expatbrit
    expatbrit

    You know Simon, one day we should post on a subject where we can agree with each other....lol

    As for me assuming that anti-Saddam = pro-Western, I'm not sure where you get that from. It's entirely possible to be anti-Saddam and anti-Western. Of course, it's rather a stretch to visualise someone being pro-Saddam and pro-Western, but that's a different story. The point of the article I quoted was that the reality of the situation in Iraq is not the hopeless mess that the political left is presenting it as. As it pointed out, Iraqis know that if the coalition had not come there, they would have still been lumbered with Saddam. They also realise that if the coalition does not now remain, the country will dissolve into chaos beyond the most desired dreams of the anti-war crowd.

    Btw, your statement

    The only reason they are in the mess they are in now is because of western interference in the past.

    accords absolutely no responsibility to non-Western nations and people for their own predicaments. This is plainly ridiculous, and any cursory examination will show that the mess they are in is because they have lacked the wisdom and forsesight to embrace democracy and free-trade capitalism. It is also classically left wing, since that branch of politics is based upon the idea that people are not capable of taking responsibility for themselves, but rather must have their lives administered by the socialist state. This is why left wingers constantly engage in a chorus of complaint rather than solving their own problems.

    Aztec:

    Would you like to play a game? Here are three words: oil, people, weapons. Please put these categories into the order of importance that you think they should go. Once you've done that, you'll be on the way to appreciating why I supported the war in Iraq, and will continue to do so even if it turns out that the most powerful weapon Saddam had was a used tampon inserter.

    Expatbrit

  • Satanus
    Satanus

    The major sounds like a true believer. From the day they start boot camp, the brainwashing begins. Recruits are mentaly groomed to turn them into good soldiers that stay w the program. I bet it's a continuous flow of of pep talks and the right facts from higher ups to keep moral up. I bet it's a bit like the wt.

    Jayson

    I was with Congress in 2002 when the war was approved.

    I suspected you were/are in govt employ or volunteer.

    SS

  • Jayson
    Jayson
    I suspected you were/are in govt employ or volunteer.

    SS. (lol) Sweet "twist" of the words.

    Az- @ 95+ * the outdoors in desert heat is hot

  • Satanus
    Satanus

    If i misunderstood your sentence, please correct me.

    SS

  • Jayson
    Jayson

    Are you really being serious SS?

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit