Wasnt it Daniel who was in service to the king (or some high up government official) and he had to go with that person to his religious services?
Seems I remember this all coming up in relation to a JW who had to take their person they were a "carer" for to church and the answer was - it was ok and the point of reference was the Daniel thing above,
so why wouldnt that work in reverse?
Of course, this is the JWs and they change the rules as they go so I am probably posing a rhetorical question.