by cofty 191 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
Nimble duck: It's a foregone conclusion that it is accepted in the Bible Belt that we all descend from a common ancestor. How you have made this an issue, and made it supposed proof of evolution is breathtaking.
Each in its own species.
The day a scientist turns a dog into a cat, I will listen.
Cofty, you keep contradicting yourself. It has been clearly noted that you have said over and over that the "proof" is still coming... yet to be found etc. Then you say "it is in".
Which is it? Stop contradicting yourself.
And by the way, it's all in type throughout the thread, so don't bother to tell us it isn't there. We can read.
ND: Each in its own species.
The day a scientist turns a dog into a cat, I will listen.
Ok. But that wasn't your argument. You said you are "baffled" that Cofty would turn a common "Bible belt" belief that "all mankind" comes from the common ancestor Adam and proceed to make it an evolutionary matter.
I was simply pointing out that you have knowingly or unknowingly introduced a strawman, since Cofty's argument is that "all living things", including those not of "mankind", share a common ancestor, one that goes back way before Adam.
All I can say about this thread now is...
What.
The.
Actual.
F*ck?
It is abundantly clear that Dumble F*ck is the very definition of a troll.
Her/his dishonesty is beneath the level that makes conversation possible. Sanchy has answered the only thing I would want to say at this point - thanks.
If anybody else has genuine questions on any of the topics I have raised in the first 40 parts of this series I will be happy to answer here or on that particular thread.
Part 41 will be online soon.
Dumble F*ck - Thank you for the suggestion of a thread on the origin of sexual reproduction. The "twofold cost of sex" is a good question; it's a pity you didn't think of it. I will probably cover it in more than one thread after I have finished describing the evolution of eyes.
Dumble F*ck - For the third time...
Please tell me which books that present the scientific evidence for biological evolution you have studied?
I predict the answer is none and that you will evade this question - So far this prediction has a 100% success rate.
Whoa! There he goes. Lit the fuse and boom.
Go on Cofty. Ram it down their throats.
Ok. But that wasn't your argument. You said you are "baffled" that Cofty would turn a common "Bible belt" belief that "all mankind" comes from the common ancestor Adam and proceed to make it an evolutionary matter.
There is no evidence that man and beast came from he same soup.
That is the evolutionist premise, is it not, that since we both have bones and meat on them those bones, that we evolved...
The Genesis account, that we all learned, speaks of all mankind coming from a common ancestor, Adam. It's a foregone conclusion that it is accepted in the Bible Belt that we all descend from a common ancestor. How you have made this an issue, and made it supposed proof of evolution is breathtaking.
How do you explain other human species like Neanderthals?
Evolutionists have no explanation for how the first living organisms came into being. When pressed, they say "it's coming".
The fossil record demonstrates a complete lack of evidence for evolution.
All (100%) of the attempts by "scientists" to reproduce even the simplest proof have failed miserably.
All the evolutionists have is wordy sentences and hostility.
