I had my experience with Jaracz.
As I have written in all my posts, they center on a swindler who has defrauded widows since the early 1980's, still doing it. In the late 1980's [about the same time Wt. article "A Time to Speak When?] in Redding the swindler he syndicated a $4,250,000 unregistered securities swindle. Late 1990's the arson investigator of city fire dept [a JW boyhood friend of my sons] agreed to write a letter to NY [stipulating he was unwilling to involve himself in cong. disputes] dealing with Shasta County Superior Court case #109555. The letter fell on deaf ears, as I had been hammering away on CO's and DO's 'simony' and bribe taking from swindler.
A few years transpired and there was a embezzlement trial of an associate of JW swindler. The DO at that time Elmer Woodley could not take any time to listen to swindler issue, even though 20 years earlier I spent my time doing a engine change in his personal Suburban. I sent him a letter he did not like. So after his trip to Bethel he called me to the back room with three prominent local elders [one his brother in law]
First thing out of his mouth was that he went to legal dept. where they told him that they had no fear of me as statute of limitations had run out so they could not be sued. Second thing was that he went to the service dept. where they told him that the "fireman recanted his letter". They WERE going to throw me out! But I had taught DO's brother in law the true meaning of Lev.5:1 as explained in 1987 Wt Sept 1st article "A Time to Speak When?" . And I had some legal precedents dealing with investments and widows. I backed all four of them down and was dismissed with the words from Woodley "to bad I won't make it into Kingdom" i replied "there is always room in the Kingdom for someone who stands up for widows".
I went to fireman asked if he recanted his letter? He said NO. But was unwilling to involve himself in congregational matters. He said if I wanted to pursue the matter further what I needed to do was hire a CPA to do a forensic audit of the swindle. I did, it cost me $3,800. It has never been read.
In a phone conversation with Barbara Anderson [discussing the RNWT revision of Lev.5:1 the basis for her article "Faulty Decrees Conceal Criminals", I told her I could never figure out why the blatant lie. She chuckled and revealed the guy on Northern Ca. service desk a Merton Campbell [see Randal Waters post on the Red Bluff Ca. molester Henderson 20 miles down the road from me]. The next sentence Barbara asked me "if per chance was I the guy in northern Ca. of whom she remembered while in Bethel who wrote the most offensive letters than anyone in USA to service dept.?" I said bingo.
Barbara just finished one of the most time consuming research projects of her life "Faulty Decrees Conceal Criminals" and I don't think any of you folks have taken any time to read it. There is an amazing relationship of Ray Franz with the "Faulty Decree" on "informing" per Lev.5:1. It is an important project because of how it relates to the molestation issue. Personally i think it is an embarrassment to the spirit of this site for her work to go unrecognized!
Barbara did not delve into the Lev.5:1 commentary in "A Time to Speak When ?" that deals with the "cursing man" being a victim of a wrong doing having under Jewish law the legal right to "put forth a call to testify" . That is a very minor usage of "a call to testify" as the major usage would be the magistrate putting forth "a call for testimony". Yet it is this commentary that reveals the slight of hand trick of making the clean man the "cursing man" into the sinner and the sinning "witness" into the clean man. Of which reveals the sept.1 1987 article "A Time to Speak When?" to be a massive deception for the purpose of instituting a "Gestapo" informant culture with in church. But it was the center of my protests as it deals with elders refusing to forward letters of criminal investigation to service dept [see my introductory post on this site].
I did a post on that deception and it went right over every bodies heads. The only thing any body could see was the black balling of my aunt for revealing medical confidentiality laws. No body could see how the deception of Lev.5:1 was being used to pull the wool over peoples eyes.
So yes Jaracz had an impact on my life as the lie told that the "fireman recanted his letter" was to big for Campbell so Woodley got it from Campbell's boss Jaracz.
