by TakeOffTheCrown 193 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
Fish,
You swim in a cesspool named confirmation bias. Every sentient thought and all of your emotions are wrapped around your beliefs.
You never consider any evidence that does not support your pre conceived views, so to state that you are analytical is a travesty to analysts and the analytical process.
You will remain convinced, irrespective of the evidence. Don't insult us.
DJS, your posted oratory is fallacy. - But if you like it......
Fisherman. Where is the eyewitness evidence that Satan was cast down to earth? I'm not talking about 1914 and the outbreak of WW1, I'm talking about a clear phenomenon celestial in nature. Surely if Satan was cast down, there would be some sort of phenomenon that most on earth would have witnessed. After all, we are talking about very powerful beings here aren't we?
No one saw Satan being cast down, neither did anyone see Jesus invisible (old light) return, therefore, did this really happen, or was it made up? why did other religious dominations not see any of this happening, even to give them a warning?
Fish,
Ya think? Are you sure you didn't mean Phallacy?
A few years ago I developed and taught, at one of the local colleges, an Intelligence Analysis course. I developed it with the assistance of the Lt. at West Point who taught the same class to the Academy's cadets. I had even selected the same texts they used, without knowing it at the time. For much of the past decade I've been privileged to work as an intelligence analyst, among other tasks, for one of the sections of our (US) gov.
So I guess you could say I'm an expert in this area. Because I'm an expert in this area. You begin your analyses with the end already formulated (End Times, Bible inerrancy, blah blah fukking blah) and you massage and force all available data and interpretations into it. It is called confirmation bias and it's all you got. And Fish, the bible, Nostradamus, your aunt's tea leaves and the stuff you pull out of your ass do not count as sources.
So when you say you are analytical it means you have made up your mind before you intensely analyze 1/1,000,000,000,000th of the data.
You flail around in a cesspool of confirmation bias. You've been ears' deep in it so long you don't realize it smells like poop. Because that is what it is.
Surely if Satan was cast down, there would be some sort of phenomenon
How do you know that?
But , with respect to 1914 as the date that Satan is actually "cast down" to earth (whatever that actually means) as the related scripture states, is a belief, a conclusion sort of speak. A noteworthy statement by Jesus -"I saw Satan falling." - alludes to such an event.
The great tribulation ....probly not. The Great Trumpulation maybe. The great storm in teacup possibly.
I love all this prophesying and shit, I 'm really good at it.
Are you sure you didn't mean Phallacy?
No, I did not mean Phallus see. I meant that your posted conclusions are false. See for yourself.
"Trump cannot even pronounce 2 Corinthians."
Yes, and I was among the many who found that HOWLINGLY FUNNY for a guy who wanted to REALLY impress conservative Xtians with how deeply spiritual he was. He said he "really loved" the Evangelicals as though that was the name of the family next door.
"Evangelical... that's Italian, ain't it?"
During his campaign Trump gave me many cringe moments, but ultimately I saw it as a choice between a migraine headache and necrotizing fasciitis. The migraine is awful, but it can be treated and survived. Not so with necrotizing hillariitis.
That shit will KILL you!
But , with respect to 1914............ is a belief, a conclusion sort of speak.... -Fisherman
The WT has published that in 1914 "the anointed" "saw" "a sign," striking proof, remarkable evidence, that such believe corresponds with" the sign of Christ's presence" - or what turned out to be the beginning of the sign of Christ's presence. There are 2 aspects to this testimony: 1. "The sign" and 2. the conclusion about what the sign means.
I believe that the testimony the anointed gives about the sign is true but I do not know if it is true for a fact because I was not there myself to measure it some way, but, I do know for a fact that wt and JW are backed up by God's Holy Spirit and that is what I am convinced about with certainty.
"I believe that the testimony the anointed give about the sign is true but I do not know if it is true for a fact because I was not there myself to measure it some way"
@Fisherman. You have just made a huge contradiction here. You need to re-read your submission, in one breath you are saying you believe, then in another you doubt whether this is true?
