by Doug Mason 19 Replies latest watchtower bible
shepherdless,
You are absolutely correct. I am deeply grateful and I shall fix the diagrams on pages 2 and 32.
You will have to give me a little while to addres the problem. This does not affect my reasoning, simply points out my artistic inabilities.
I shall let you know when I have done it.
Many thanks,
Doug
shepherdless,
Many thanks!
I have corrected the diagrams.
Please let me know of any other problems.
It is the Watchtower's duty to provide consistent, objective, incontrovertable evidence for their explanation of 1919. It is not good enough to work from possibilities and assumptions.
The Bible does not say that the Jews entered Egypt in the 7th month. The Bible does not say that Jerusalem fell in the 7th month. The WTS has a duty of care, a responsibility to discharge information with honesty and openness. We expect that of our secular authorities. Religious authorities should not have a lower standard.
Doug
Thomas,
I would be delighted if you translate it. If you need the original diagrams, email me.
I only ask that you send me the finished translation. I would add it to my site.
Contact me directly by email if you have any problems.
Is there anything else on my site (jwstudies.com) you would be interested in?
Doug
Doug Mason:
Many thanks!
Atlantis!
One thing that is a certainty is the past Presidents and GB members bullshitted themselves into power by their own will and desire, supported by the marketing of Christ's return as a focused and alluring foundation doctrine.
Ironically their specific date setting goes in direct disobedience to Jesus's own admonishment of his faithful followers to not set a time on God's sacred time.
All of these turn of the century religious leaders/Charlatans are not true followers of Christ but followers of their own expressive ideologies purposed toward their own means and purpose.
When J Rutherford announced that Jesus had exclusively chosen him (1919) and his organization was his attempt to validate himself as the FDSL upon taking over the Watchtower Publishing house.
Good deceptive lies which proved to reassure his position and stronghold over this publishing company.
Read this as a preamble:
"It is the Watchtower's duty to provide consistent, objective, incontrovertible evidence for their explanation of 1919. It is not good enough to work from possibilities and assumptions.
The Bible does not say that the Jews entered Egypt in the 7th month. The Bible does not say that Jerusalem fell in the 7th month. The WTS has a duty of care, a responsibility to discharge information with honesty and openness. We expect that of our secular authorities. Religious authorities should not have a lower standard."
"The Watchtower Society’s claim that it is appointed by God as his earthly representative rests on its claim that its appointment occurred in 1919 CE. To arrive at that date, and the significance that the Society ascribes to
To arrive at that date, and the significance that the Society ascribes to it, requires a chronological journey spanning more than 2,500 years.
If a person does not understand or agree with the statements made regarding dates of events in the 6th century BCE, then that person has no justification for devoting their life, their energy, their commitment to the Watchtower Society."
__________________________
"To arrive at these dates of the early 20th century, the Watchtower starts with the date of the Fall of Babylon, which is generally agreed with as 539 BCE. The story then moves slightly forwards in time to the return of Exiles from Babylon.
Without providing any objective justification, the Watchtower assigns October 537 BCE to the moment when Jews assembled at the site of the destroyed Jerusalem.
Further, without any direct statement from Scripture, it says this moment marked the end of Jeremiah’s decreed “70 years”.
coalize,
I do not understand your question.
For the Watchtower Society, their key critically important date is 1919 CE. They use 1914 as well as the destruction of Jerusalem by the Babylonians as distractions. I presume they know what they are doing.
Doug
HI,
Resulting from helpful recommendations by several of you, I made adjustments to some details. None of these affects the substance. Some are cosmetic only.
To ensure that the touched up version is being accessed, I have added "Revision 2" to the filename.
http://www.jwstudies.com/Watchtower_s_607_BCE_Foundation_Exposed_Revision_2.pdf
Do you think I need to start another thread to ensure this Revision receives better exposure?
Doug
Great work as usual Doug
keep 'em' coming M8
