"By Bill Hickman of RNZ
The New Zealand Branch of the Jehovah’s Witnesses is going to court in an attempt to have the church made exempt from the Abuse in Care inquiry today.
In the High Court at Wellington, lawyers for the church are seeking a declaration that the church is not responsible for the care of children or vulnerable people in New Zealand.
Abuse survivor advocate and former church Elder Shayne Mechen said the church was trying to use a technicality to side-step its inclusion in the inquiry.
“The response from former Jehovah’s Witnesses is they’re basically saying ‘what a bunch of liars’. Because everyone who has been a part of that organisation knows that the Elders are encouraged to look after children, to do things with them.”
Mechen said the move was a “kick in the guts” for those who suffered abuse and those brave enough to relive their experience for the inquiry.
“They had high hopes, those hopes have been smashed,” he said.
The Jehovah's Witness church has been fighting scrutiny from a national inquiry.
“They’ve been re-traumatised and there’s no hope at all for them to get any justice from what the Jehovah’s Witnesses are doing.”
Mechen said the argument was based on the church’s lack of bricks and mortar facilities for young people.
He said, if upheld, the review could allow Jehovah’s Witnesses groups across the commonwealth to evade their culpability for past abuse.
Luke Hollis was an abuse survivor from a Jehovah’s Witnesses following in Britain.
He said he hoped the New Zealand courts would see through the church’s argument.
“It is a very common rhetoric: ‘We don’t have any nurseries, we don’t have specific schools for children who are Jehovah’s Witnesses, so how can we be accountable? We are not care givers’. But the actual reality is very, very different,” Hollis said.
The power structure of the church meant trusted Elders could control who young people spend time with, Hollis said.
As a child, he said he would be assigned to spend time in the sole supervision of his abuser well beyond the confines of any formal church structure.
“In their preaching work they go door-to-door, they go to different events and what not. For myself, every week my abuser would have the power to say ‘that person is going to come with me for two hours and knock on some doors’.
“So even though that isn’t in a physical setting that is an example of how perpetrators of abuse have access to children but not in an official setting such as a school or a nursery,” Hollis said.
The judicial review was scheduled take place over two days in Wellington High Court this week.
- RNZ"
New Zealand - JWs head to court on Abuse in Care Inquiry - RNZ news story
by EasyPrompt 36 Replies latest watchtower scandals
-
EasyPrompt
-
Diogenesister
Let's hope they accept the conclusions that law courts of other commonwealth countries have come to, regarding the absolute authority those 'taking the lead' within Jehovahs witnesses wield over children. -
EasyPrompt
Yes, I hope they do too. It's time for these guys to get shut down.
(Some older news stories...)
https://www.newsweek.com/jehovahs-witnesses-child-sex-abuse-lawsuit-1454001
https://www.newsweek.com/jehovahs-witnesses-child-sex-abuse-lawsuit-1454001
-
Vidiot
Goddamn…
…they gotta be stalling for time.
There’s no fucking way the Org’s lawyers think they can win this one.
😆
-
joe134cd
I really do hope this makes it to prime time news on television.
-
Vidiot
Then link, “Like”, and hashtag the shit out of it.
-
EasyPrompt
Bill Hickman reporting - "Lawyers acting for the New Zealand Branch of the Jehovah's Witnesses Church dominated the first day of proceedings in Wellington High Court on Monday, arguing the church should be exempt from inclusion in the Abuse in Care inquiry.
In the judicial review, the church said it was beyond the scope of the inquiry as it did not operate institutions that took children, young persons or vulnerable adults into care.
The church's counsel were seeking to draw a line between abuse occurring among members of the church and an opportunity for abuse created by the church taking people into formal structures of care.
They said only a third of the statements made to the inquiry by survivors alleging abuse involved Elders of the church, and each of these had occurred in private settings.
Lawyer Sarah Jerebine described a 13-year-old girl abused by an Elder while on a family holiday as an example being beyond the inquiry's scope as it occurred in a family setting.
The church took up the majority of Monday's proceedings, its lawyers outlining 17 points backing its arguments for the court to consider.
Early in proceedings, Judge Rebecca Ellis said the repetitious nature of the arguments sent a message that they were more about obfuscation than clarity.
Ellis was critical of the church's handling of allegations of sexual abuse. She highlighted examples of abuse - provided by the church - where incidents of sexual connection involving a five- to six-year-old girl, and another involving a 15-year-old girl, were treated as adultery.
"How they address sexual abuse is by categorising it as adultery. That's not victim-focused."
Shayne Mechen, advocate for survivors of abuse in Jehovah's Witnesses followings, attended the hearing. He said the stance was the "same rhetoric" offered by the church countless times.
"They're saying 'it was an individual it's not the faith', and yet the individual was an Elder and the Jehovah's Witnesses are appointing these Elders. So what is it? [Victims] are not going to get any physical life help. They're not going to be cared for."
The hearing was set down to continue Tuesday, when the court will hear from the Abuse in Care inquiry's lawyers.""
https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/assets/6-Going-to-Court/calendar/daily-lists/20231010-High-Court-daily-list.pdf