Hello everybody,
I happen to be the source of information Jacques Luc mentioned to Celia.
Just to introduce myself, I became a JW in 1972, at the age of 13. Then a pioneer and a member of the French Bethel from 1981 to 1985. Finally disfellowshipped on the grounds of "apostasy" in 1986.
The case I related to Jacques is the following: about 3 years ago, my father (who is still an elder among JWs, as far as I know) had to undergo a new heart surgical intervention. Although I had no direct contact with him, I heard from my stepsister (who is not a JW) that a few days before his hospitalization he received from the HLC some documents (probably not originated from the WT itself, rather something like a jurisprudence study in the press) to the effect that the hospital practitioners would not have any chance to be sued if they had to administer him a blood transfusion against his declared "will". As I understand, he was greatly relieved and gladly communicated the documents to his surgeon. That's all I know, and unfortunately I'm not in a position to check this matter further with him at the present time (hopefully someday!).
My guess is that through this kind of "double talk" the WT now tries to reduce as much as possible the casualties of its blood policy, without having to deny it "officially" through a "new light". Of course this case is related to the law and jurisprudence in France, but it may have some correspondence in other countries as well.
Bye,
Narkissos