You don't have the faintest idea what the word "prove" means. What you posted was a fantasy, devoid of any logical arguments supporting your assertion.
I suspect you know better than that but would rather lie to save face. / You Know
by You Know 54 Replies latest jw friends
You don't have the faintest idea what the word "prove" means. What you posted was a fantasy, devoid of any logical arguments supporting your assertion.
I suspect you know better than that but would rather lie to save face. / You Know
YK,
It is pretty obvious who is telling the lie.
Can you point to a single sentence or paragraph in your above rant that forms even the crudest deductive argument? Do you even know what that is?
All you have posted is a mixture of threats, personal attacks and bold assertions. There simply are no arguments there.
- Jan
--
Faith, n. Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel. [Ambrose Bierce, The DevilĀ“s Dictionary, 1911]
You Know
I dont deny this "world" is mortal and is due for destruction. But, have you actually READ what the Bible says in its correct context?
Does not Judgement start with the house of God?
Which is more abominable to Jah, a political system that keeps civilisation "stable" or a religious system that blapshemes Jah, Jesus, Holy Spirit, even those who reside in the heavens at each and every opportunity?
The fact is You Know, that YOUR religious organisation is toast, is worse than any political nation. Just along with each and every other religious organisation. Except yours is special. Yours is the 2nd wild beast from Revelation 13. You have recieved the mark of the beast by becoming baptised into that twisted organisation.
POLITICS CANNOT FIT REVELATION 13. No matter how much history is twisted.
The apostate's motto is: avoid the facts at all cost. Create side show diversions and ridicule anyone that brings the truth to bear upon you. Such foolishness comes at a price.
In fulfillment of your own words.
If you weren't determined to remain ignorant, you could easily verify the truth if what I say about the system being self-doomed. A lot of very intelligent people, other than Larouche, realize that the system is going to blow up soon. It is also a given the WWIII will be like no other war that has ever been fought. Your only "reason" for not believing such a thing is imminent is because it would force you to come to terms with the fact that the Bible foretold such a dead-end for this world. To the apostate that is an anathema! / You Know
:If you weren't determined to remain ignorant, you could easily verify the truth if what I say about the system being self-doomed.
If you weren't so cowardly and produced some evidence then we could all verify what you said is true. The plain facts are, you haven't.
: A lot of very intelligent people, other than Larouche, realize that the system is going to blow up soon.
I'm glad you excluded Larouche from the set called "intelligent people." Once again, you fail to name any, however.
: It is also a given the WWIII will be like no other war that has ever been fought.
It first has to be a given that there will be a WWIII and on your time table. Once you can prove that, we'll listen to the rest of what you have to say. As with everything else, you not only haven't you refused to do so.
: Your only "reason" for not believing such a thing is imminent is because it would force you to come to terms with the fact that the Bible foretold such a dead-end for this world.
You're confused, YK. The assertion that the Bible fortold a "dead-end" for the world has nothing whatsoever to do with the assertion that is it imminent. Do you see the difference? Probably not.
: To the apostate that is an anathema!
Yes, gibberish without any substance whatsoever being parroted from statements by a thoroughly discredited and total loser and crackpot like Larouche IS an anathema!
Sigh.
Farkel
Does not Judgement start with the house of God?
Yes it does. Did you read what I wrote on that topic?
Which is more abominable to Jah, a political system that keeps civilisation "stable" or a religious system that blapshemes Jah, Jesus, Holy Spirit, even those who reside in the heavens at each and every opportunity?
Jehovah's judgment day involves all creatures and institutions. That is not new light.
The fact is You Know, that YOUR religious organisation is toast, is worse than any political nation. Just along with each and every other religious organisation. Except yours is special. Yours is the 2nd wild beast from Revelation 13. You have recieved the mark of the beast by becoming baptised into that twisted organisation.
I believe the Watchtower will get toasted, but I also suspect that you are a lunatic of some sort.
/ You Know
Expat, the list of LaRouche's mouthings is too funny. I remember he also claims H.M. Queen Elizabeth II is the guiding force behind the international drug trade. And I remember the election year when he bought an hour of prime time on a major TV network to inform America that the solution to all our political and social problems is to start a massive space program to colonize Mars. I watched that program, and it was obvious after the first five minutes that he needs major psychiatric help.
You don't suppose he's any kin to Joe "God's Mouthpiece" Rutherford, do you? They do sound amazingly similar.
Hmmm. Maybe they ARE kin. Maybe Old Joe left a secret directive to the GB--maybe LaRouche is the GB's mouthpiece! And his organization is the politcal-action arm of the WTBTS! Today, Brooklyn--tomorrow, THE WORLD! AND MARS!
Sounds as logical as anything else I've heard from the GB and Larouche . . . .
Bill
"If we all loved one another as much as we say we love God, I reckon there wouldn't be as much meanness in the world as there is."--from the movie Resurrection (1979)
Hey XJWBill,
I rather listen to JUDGE Rutherford any time instead listing to Satan's mouthpiece like you.
XJWBill:
My source at Bethel has let slip who is really the power behind the WT:
Throw You Know a frickin' bone, will ya!
Expatbrit
If you weren't so cowardly and produced some evidence then we could all verify what you said is true. The plain facts are, you haven't.
Oh Please. Stop blustering. I provided a link to an article in the latest issue of EIR. No one chose to comment on it, obviously for the simple reason that you have no rebuttal. / You Know