by pleaseresearch 97 Replies latest social current
Its not what I think its what I know, that its easy to support freedom of speech when you agree with the speech. Its most needed when its the most stupid or hateful speech.
this is liberalism at its worst. And why I hate FB, Twitter and the other tech asshats.
A lot of his stuff is insane conspiracy theories but every once in awhile there is a nugget of truth in there. He does condemn people without much evidence, so that could be considered slander. I think the people who want to watch this kind of stuff already know about him and will look for his videos elsewhere.
I’m not a fan of his but i agree with the poster that mentioned we then should go after every other slanderer. If the powers that be do not and seem to only go after conservatives, it sounds suspicious.
Alex Jones reminds me exactly of what the Wts does. Say horrible and slanderous things about everyone and finally when someone says or does anything, the great persuasion is apon us.
Good for YouTube.
Frankly, I'm kinda surprised they haven't given him the boot sooner.
Absolutely no fan of Jones, but I can't think of anything worse than banning him on YouTube, FB, etc..
It's like the Russians banning JWs - just feeds into their conspiracy theory/persecution mentality and won't do much else.
Banning beliefs (even batshit crazy ones) accomplishes nothing.
Sunlight is the best disinfectant. Period.
For those of you that don’t see how this feeds confirmation bias, I’m sorry the reptilian overlords have brainwashed you.
P.S. Bill Clinton is a Rapist
Downloads of the Infowars Official App have completely eclipsed the rest of the dying media’s own apps in the face of Big Tech censoring Alex Jones and his platform on Monday.
The Infowars Official App is currently ranked at #4 in in Apple’s App Store, soaring above CNN (#6), Google News (#5), Buzzfeed (#10), Fox News (#7), The New York Times (#11), ABC (#19), and BBC (#26).
Its not what I think its what I know, that its easy to support freedom of speech when you agree with the speech. Its most needed when its the most stupid or hateful speech.
Nobody is preventing him from speaking, he can go on with his idiotic show as much as he wants. He'll still be able to advance his lies and delusions.
His freedom of speech does not supersede the right of a private business to manage their assets the way they see fit.
It's like the Russians banning JWs - just feeds into their conspiracy theory/persecution mentality and won't do much else.
No it's not the same, because that is the government.
A better analogy would be if a Russian radio station banned content from JWS, which again, would be totally acceptable.
