You see Perry, I actually read your source and what follows is what she thinks of people like you who misquote her:
Village Idiot,
That's great! I'm glad you read that source. There was no misquote. It was word for word, which is easily checked. I think you are confusing quotes with something else.
It really is incomprehensible that anyone would claim the "contaminated bio-film" explanation anymore. That was a very early accusation, now discarded. I'm glad that you have abandoned that. The fact is that a great many dinosaur soft tissues, blood vessels, collagen, blood fragments and DNA have been found, and will continue to be found.
The interesting thing is that DNA has been proven to have a half life of 521 years. So how does detectable dna last 65 million years as claimed by darwinists? I don't have that much faith. But Darwinists do.
Let's say you and I were to walk through the woods and come across some bones that stank like death. You know, that unmistakable stench of death. We would both conclude that something died recently. But as soon as you are told it is a dinosaur bone, then your interpretation would likely change because it threatens the suppression of our innate knowledge of God. All people know that God exists and that he created all things. God put this knowledge in man. Many just suppress it.
For example, one paleontologist student noticed the smell of death when opening a dinosaur bone:
"It smelled just like one of the cadavers we had in the lab"
But when this was brought to the attention of the professor he simply remarked:
'Oh, yeah, all Hell Creek bones smell,"
article
Imagine all the old line paleontologists who smelled that stench of rotting cadavers and never even once thought that they might not be 65 million years old. The human brain is capable of amazing feats of suppression.
Because of the internet, the universities cannot sanitize information like they used to before being presented for general consumption. The evidence of fresh, young dinosaurs is everywhere now:
* Summer 2015 UPDATE: Two Dinosaur Soft Tissue Predictions Confirmed! Real Science Radio hosts Bob Enyart and Fred Williams had predicted on air and in writing atrsr.org/predictions that:
- Dinosaur soft tissue will be found not only in rare circumstances, but rather easily, i.e., when looked for. CONFIRMED in JUNE 2015! The journal Nature Communications reported original tissue in six of eight dinosaur bones investigated, leading to the conclusion that "preservation is more common than previously thought." And:
- Original dinosaur and other soft tissue will be found largely independent of the claimed age of the fossil. CONFIRMED in April 2014! The Journal of Paleontology reported original soft tissue in Precambrian "beard worms" that are allegedly 530 million years old!
Internets' most complete source of Dinosaur facts that conflict with a darwinian worldview
Anthony Flew said that he abandoned atheism because the facts led him elsewhere. I think that is an honest assessment of the situation for many.
Food For Thought: Does the existence of still rotting, stinking dinosaur flesh fit better with a young earth paradigm or an old earth paradigm?
