And so it begins (page 5)

RandomTask

Or did I mean to say at worst? Or maybe its just non-gender-specific....

Hell maybe its just a hell of a good time!!!

Robdar

Azzy, my hot little bunny, come to Robbie!

Stacy Smith

Some men, who've dated bisexuals and take direction well, are quite good at oral.

It stands to reason, a man knows what feels good on a man, a woman knows what feels good on a woman.

I just thought it was funny how many homophobes I know are still into anal.

I am not calling Yeru a homophobe by the way. He's anti gay marriage and for some reason thinks that allowing gays to marry will bring the downfall of society.

I think deficite spending will bring it down faster.

Yerusalyim

Does a society or civilization NEED morals in order for it to survive, thrive and prosper? And then how do you draw the line between what is moral and what is not?

The answer to the above question is a resounding YES!

Stacey darlin...it's not that "gay marriage" will lead to the downfall of society...rather...that if we allow gay marriage...then polygamy is also ok...and making a twist...if a 13 year old girl in Florida can have an abortion without parental consent...then why can't she also marry...even if it's with a 46 year old?

It's not the matter of this one "isolated" case as someone pointed out earlier...it's that I said just a few weeks ago that if this went through...the Polygamists, etc would be in court demanding their "rights" as well...and so it begins.

ROBYN darlin...I'll try to learn to share...especially if there's a ME sandwich involved....me you and Aztec?

Yes...sometimes anal and oral are better than vaginal sex

One last thing...no, I'm not a homophobe...nor against gays...I do think that there should be some mechanism in place to facilitate hosptial visitation...inheritance...etc...but most of that can already be done with some prior planning...but I am against gay marriage...or polygamy...or marrying your dog.

SixofNine

And right here you pretty much have so-called "conservatives" summed up: they're afraid of everything. Decisions are not an honest brave action based on the current knowledge at all, but rather a reaction to fear of change. *don't take my banky!!!!! whaaa!!*

Conservatives are anything but conservative. "What might happen if we change things? (said whiningly)" "better the devil you know", etc, etc, attitudes are not conservative, they're reckless. Conservatives have co-op'd the word conservative in much the same way Jehovah's Witnesses co-op'd the word truth. Conservatives are, at heart, simply sissies, imo.

Eyebrow2

The NH Supreme Court rulled a few weeks ago that if a married person has sex with someone that is the same sex, then it is not adultery, so not grounds for divorce.

Now THAT pissed me off! I hope the gay rights advocates will speak up and fight that, because besides cheapening marriage vows, to me it cheaps gay relationships. So maybe they came help squash that while they are fighting for their own rights.

As far as I am concerned allowing gays to marry just makes it so gay couples have to be acountable to each other. So if they are going to commit, they can get married, and have to live up to that commitment as if they were in a hetro marriage.

Adultery makes me sick, as well does pediophilia....I don't think gay marriage will cheapen marriage..and it to view it along the same line as pologymy or bigamy is silly. I am all for marriage between two people....as long as the partners are consenting adults, I really dont care if they are gay or straight. And that Tom Green guy, correct me if I am wrong, but I believe at least one of his wives was a very young teenager...how could she have consent?

THe problem with the ruling in Mass is that the courts there should have referred it to legislature. I don't think they really had the authority to make they ruling they did.

Eyebrow2

By the way...while I am on my soap box.

I read a great editorial in the DallasMorning news a few days ago. It said that those that stand up and are trying to fight gay marriage because it undermines the sanctiy of marriage should also be standing up and fighting against divorce. Interestingly, a lot of politicians all bent out of shape about gay marriage has been divorced several times.

I think divorce is a much bigger problem threatening the santitiy of marriage than gay marriage. Forgive me lack of spelling talent...I have the flu AGAIN, so I am a little off the ball...not that I ever could spell hahah

Satanus

NH Supreme Court rulled a few weeks ago that if a married person has sex with someone that is the same sex, then it is not adultery, so not grounds for divorce.

Hey, that's where the wt was a few yrs ago. Are there similarities, or what?

SS

Aztec

but I am against gay marriage...or polygamy...or marrying your dog.

WTH? How is marrying your dog anything akin to marrying your lifelong partner? C'mon Yeru!

~Aztec

Mysterious

People take dumb things to court all the time. Anyone remember MacDonald's coffee "Caution: Hot". Or the new lawsuits "Fast Food chains made me fat". Just because they are going to court doesn't mean they the courts will rule in the favor of the defendant. And just because they approved gay marriage does not mean they are going to approve polygamy. Any way you look at it one consenting partner regardless of gender is still a completely seperate issue from multiple partners.

And so it begins

Share this