I conclude evolution is guided (page 37)

Landy

Viv's Law: anytime someone uses the word "quantum" in an effort to prove a higher power, you can be 100% certain that person doesn't know what either of those things mean.

Well, I do and I don't. Both at the same time.

And a cat.

:)

Ruby456

Viv's Law: anytime someone uses the word "quantum" in an effort to prove a higher power, you can be 100% certain that person doesn't know what either of those things mean. viv

I agree viv. and indeed as you can probably see I am not using quantum physics to invoke a higher power but to understand why another power/s may be invoked. I am dead against higher powers. But Kate was talking about the idea of creativity as well and she expresses enough doubt and ambiguity about what God as higher power represents.

Landy

Time flies like an arrow and...

....fruit flies like a banana

(bill bryson - mother tongue)

cofty

Kate was talking about the idea of creativity as well.

As we have seen in this thread creativity has absolutely nothing to do with homochirality.

Ruby456

cofty, Kate is talking about chemistry and the formation of molecules. The processes here are similar (but not the same of course) to the electrochemical processes in physics - the interactions of quarks that is. please stop misleading

cofty

The processes here are similar (but not the same of course) to the electrochemical processes in physics - the interactions of quarks that is.

Really?

Quarks are assembled by autocatalysis? Wow! You should publish that paper immediately. A Nobel Prize awaits.

I conclude evolution is guided

Share this