Eye opening article about the...

by Smyler 21 Replies latest jw friends

  • Smyler
    Smyler

    International Convention in Sydney, Australia and the history of the WTS.

    http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/12/08/1070732144093.html

    Eccentric, maybe, but their kingdom keeps coming

    By Chris McGillion
    December 9, 2003

    Printer friendly versionPrint this article
    Email to a friendEmail to a friend

    This week's convention of Jehovah's Witnesses in Sydney (which is expected to involve 60,000) is being viewed by those outside the organisation as a curious logistical exercise and - despite its relative uniqueness in a secular city like Sydney - little else.

    It seems the idea that those attending may have something to offer beyond a small boost to the local economy is beyond the imagination of some people and may even reflect the Witnesses' reputation as God-fearing nuisances who want to convert everybody else to their eccentric beliefs.

    That is unfortunate for two reasons. First, Jehovah's Witnesses are deeply committed people who could teach the members of other faiths a thing or two about how to be passionate and enthusiastic about one's beliefs without also being dangerous or threatening. After all, door-knocking is at the benign end of religious fanaticism these days.

    Second, the Jehovah's Witnesses offer a textbook study in the origin, mutation and appeal of fringe Christian churches.

    The Jehovah's Witnesses are a product of a 19th-century American culture that also spawned the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (Mormons), the Christadelphians, Seventh Day Adventists and the Christian Science movement.

    The church's teachings owe their origin to Charles Taze Russell, a congregationalist from Pennsylvania who began publishing the Watchtower magazine in 1879 and founded the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society two years later (the name Jehovah's Witnesses was adopted in 1931). The church owes its initial success to the free market in religious ideas that has long permeated the United States and the popularity of "end times" beliefs among Americans towards the end of the 1800s.

    Russell proclaimed that Jesus Christ would return in 1874. When nothing much happened, he revised his prophecy to say that Jesus' presence had descended but that his physical return would occur in 1914 when the world would end as well. This came to nothing, although the outbreak of World War I allowed Russell to save some face and his following grew.

    After Russell's death, Joseph Franklin Rutherford was elected president. Rutherford, who predicted that the great prophets of the Bible would return in physical form to mark the end of the world in 1925, had a luxurious house built for them in San Diego (which he occupied) and declared that "millions now living will never die".

    The movement survived the 1925 no-shows and another mistake over dating the world's demise by insisting that "Gentile Times" at least had come to an end. When a third prediction of a more tangible finale came to nothing in 1975, a large number left the church. Leaders finally conceded that while setting dates added urgency to their beliefs, it also left them open to derision, and they stopped the practice.

    As the church grew, there was a problem with its teaching that only 144,000 believers would be saved. This was resolved by distinguishing between those who would enjoy paradise in heaven and the many more who would experience it on earth.

    If teachings have been modified over the years, so too have approaches to encouraging new members. Systematic door-knocking, for instance, became popular after World War II. The church says its active members spend, on average, 200 hours a year door-knocking and that last year they notched up well over a billion hours worldwide.

    With 6 million members (about 60,000 Australians), the Witnesses must be doing something right. Part of that involves finding people who are facing personal crises, encouraging them to blame their problems on the "world", and then recommending they take refuge in the supportive environment of the church. (The results are not always positive. In Awakening of a Jehovah's Witness: Escape from the Watchtower Society, published this year in the US, a former member, Diane Wilson, described being cut off from family and friends who were not Witnesses, being encouraged to "spy" on other members, and other manipulative behaviour inside the organisation.)

    Part of their success may also be due to its organisational flexibility. Mainstream churches remain essentially parochially focused, an arrangement that suits static populations but looks increasingly like a feudal relic in more mobile communities. Jehovah's Witnesses, by contrast, have local "kingdom halls". But they are linked by a small publishing empire and motivated by periodic mass rallies - such as this week's convention.

    That is another reason why this gathering is more interesting than simply the number of hotel rooms it will account for.

    Its great that the WTS is getting this publicity, especially about the predictions.

  • asleif_dufansdottir
    asleif_dufansdottir

    Somebody should fill the reporter in on their pedophile problem. A notice warning people in the area about potential pedophiles roaming the streets would be lovely publicity.

  • greven
    greven

    Nice article!

    A better newsreport then usual, when they just lap up the info the 'slave' gives them to publish.

    This however in not correct:

    Russell proclaimed that Jesus Christ would return in 1874. When nothing much happened, he revised his prophecy to say that Jesus' presence had descended but that his physical return would occur in 1914

    Russell didn't learn about the doctrine of the invisible presence (parousia) of Jesus in 1874 until two years later in 1876 from Nelson H. Barbour. So Russell did not predict anything regarding 1874. He did however teach this doctrine until his death in 1916, and Rutherford continued this doctrine up until 1930.

    Greven

  • Maverick
    Maverick

    You can be sure that if the WTS uses any of this as PR they will cut and paste and use partial quotes just like movie studios do in their theater ads! Maverick

  • RR
    RR

    These guys apparently do little research. Russell livd and died believing the Lord returned in 1874. NEVER did he ever teach a physical return in 1914.

    RR

  • gumby
    gumby
    NEVER did he ever teach a physical return in 1914.

    Did he teach a SPIRITUAL return in 1914? Was he correct? Where did he get the date from?

    *** Studies in the Scriptures Vol.2, 1906 p.101 ***

    The Kingdom of God is already begun, which is pointed out in prophecy as due to begin the exercise of power in A.D. 1878, and that the "battle of the great day of God Almighty" which will end in 1914 with the complete overthrow of the earth's present rulership, is already commenced.

    He too, was a false prophet RR

    Gumby

  • RR
    RR

    He never claimed to be a prophet, he was prophesying, he was attempting to interpret a prophecy already established in scripture.

    When 1914 came and went, he admitted his mistake, unlike the Society of today.

    RR

  • Euphemism
    Euphemism

    RR... I understand that Russell is a highly respected figure among Bible Students, and I don't mean to attack him.

    But I'm not sure that it's fair to say that Russell "admitted his mistake." Isn't it more correct to say that he continued to try to stretch the chronology as much as possible, claiming that 1914 was the beginning of the time of troubles (instead of the end, as he had previously predicted), and that WWI would end in Armageddon? This despite the fact that he had earlier stated that changing his chronology by merely one year would destroy the entire framework.

  • RR
    RR

    The Chronology to my understanding is correct, what was expected was a bit short sighted, much of what Russel taught in his writings have had fulfillment. Not that I or anty of the Bible Stuents believe him to be a prophet, he never claimed to be a prophet and Bible Students do not believe he was a prophet.

    A prophet is someone who speaks of things to come by the mouth of Jehovah, to my knowledge, Jehovah never whispered anything in Russell's ear. The events he spoke about that he believed were to happen by 1914 were not self-styled prophecies. Meaning he didn't make them up, these prophecies were already expounded on in the scriptures, with a future fulfillment. Russell erred in trying to determine whne these prophecies were to be fulfilled. That's not a false prophet, just a false expectation.

    RR

  • NeonMadman
    NeonMadman
    A prophet is someone who speaks of things to come by the mouth of Jehovah, to my knowledge, Jehovah never whispered anything in Russell's ear. The events he spoke about that he believed were to happen by 1914 were not self-styled prophecies. Meaning he didn't make them up, these prophecies were already expounded on in the scriptures, with a future fulfillment. Russell erred in trying to determine whne these prophecies were to be fulfilled. That's not a false prophet, just a false expectation.

    Isn't that the same sort of excuse that the WTS gives today for their false prophecies? There are only two requirements for a false prophet, according to Deuteronomy 18:

    1. He speaks in the name of the Lord

    2. The thing he predicts does not come true.

    Does Russell qualify under these two requirements? I believe he does. Did he not claim to be the "faithful and wise servant" and "God's channel"? Didn't he claim that his chronology was "God's dates, not ours"? One who assumes such titles and makes such claims is professing to speak for the Lord. Notice that Deuteronomy 18 does not require that one must claim to be "inspired" or "infallible", or even that he must claim to be a prophet. To say that one is speaking the words of the Lord is to claim all of those things. If his prophecies fail, he stands condemned.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit