from the lesson today:
Hence, the wife's subjection to her husband in no way implies inferiority. Rather, it dignifies a woman, allowing her to use her many gifts and talents in harmony with God's will.
Always the doublespeak; less is more, and subjection is freedom. The unexpressed thought here is that to speak out, think independently and stand out without a husband or elder's permission, is to use their gifts against God's will. Hmm.
What is another way we can show our concern? In our prayers we should petition Jehovah to support such dear, faithful sisters to continue loyally in their service. They deserve to be reassured that they are warmly loved and deeply appreciated by Jehovah and the entire Christian congregation.--Psalm 37:28.
Expressed another way: Better pray for 'em, cause we sure are NOT going to initiate any charitable arrangement for them, or help raise the kids they probably had out of wedlock; we are saving our money for the pioneers, the real christians. The slackers and those not clever or duplicitous enough to get a man will get none of our resources. AND we won't let the local congregations start anything either.
The gender policy of the WT is so unbelievably shortsighted; the thing is, they are locked into it. They have continued with the policy of all things being true and correct in the Bible; thus, the stupid fate of Jepthah's daughter (did God really want Jephthah to sacrifice his daughter??? and does she have a name??), the ranting against women by the apostle Paul, a real believer in keeping women down; and the scandalous denial of the role of Deborah. Here the WT does exactly what they demonize in every other faith: they say that what the Bible says, it does not MEAN. And so it denies the reality of women's role in Israel and even the early christian congregation.
Well, stupid policy begets stupid behavior. Just look around you at the hall.