The ends such evolution might serve might be to raise man to the same level as the creator (though many religionists would balk at that idea, probably as much as you balk at the idea of a Creator, perse - which was one of my earlier points).
For textual support - being "conformed to the image of His Son" (Rom.8:29, and surrounding chapter, which key's back into the "anointed" thing.
You still seem fixated with the idea of eternal suffering for those who don't meet the mark.
I wasn't going there as, to be honest, I have no experiential data to validate such a theology.
Maybe I shouldn't have mentioned my interest in Calvinist doctrine, as it seems to have warped how you view my position. Another good reason for me to avoid labels, huh - consider it a lesson learned - back to simply being an unorthodox Christian.
Perhaps I just enjoyed Arthur C. Clarke's visionary works, including his 2001 series, a little too much.
Maybe the purpose of the Adam and Eve story wasn't so much to denigrate us, as to give us a world view that we can better ourselves beyond our birthright and achieve something that we "allegedly" once had.