Peacefulpete: I had never heard about the "Bright" label, but on your advice I found and read Dawkins' article in The Guardian. I'm not very enthusiastic either. First, that's the kind of label we don't really need (yet) in Voltaire's country: here any public religious / cultic / occult commitment will definitely bring more scorn than trust or respect. I can imagine that a sort of "rationalistic pride" may be useful in countries (such as the U.S.?) where religious people are deemed more trustworthy, or serious, than unbelievers. Even so, I would have picked up something less elitist, on a social/educational standpoint. Because "bright", as I feel it, could create much misunderstanding and even hate, especially in view of the dominant judeo-christian "value" of "humility"... I also think of the Iranian model (my wife is Iranian), where much of the popular support for the fundamentalistic Islamic revolution was fueled by a spirit of revenge against the "enlightened" upper-class and its "bright" Western views under the Shah. A lack of pedagogy can bring us centuries backwards.