I do like your new avatar - I believe it is the San Diego State Aztecs.
How did all the animals fit on Noah's Ark?
by hooberus 207 Replies latest watchtower bible
-
-
Aztec
Damn, I thought they were in Arizona.
~Aztec
-
micheal
Arizona Wildcats
-
Aztec
You're an NCAA fan aren't you? Blech!
~Aztec
-
micheal
I'm sure we just highjacked this thread - but I'm a sports fan really
-
Aztec
Hijack? Oh yeah baby! I'm good at that....LOL!
~Aztec
-
spiritwalker
Noah downloaded their DNA on to a Super Computer with a Pen"holy"ium 7 proccessor, with a 777 GB harddrive. Of course, thanks to a virus produced by the prophet Bill, son of the Gates, we lost all the Dinorsaurs upon the earth drying and ended up with all sorts of weird animals in Australia when the porn got mixed it from Ham's little nightly adventure. Yet in the end, Jehovah "I am the firewall", set up a rainbow and said it would happen no more. Which, sense the Rainbow is most closely assocaited with the gay movement, we can only assume that God was talking out of his RAM.
-
drwtsn32
I like U2K!! His posts provide comic relief...
-
iiz2cool
So do your's Doc!
Love ya!
~Aztec
-
hooberus
Hillary said:
our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is an absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.?
I agree with him entirely, and he certainly does not fit the criteria that I originally set for your to follow in my challenge.
Best regards - HS
The evolutionists I quoted verified my earlier statements:
"So then are the evolutionists who apriori exclude creation as an option before looking at the facts, and who only limit themselves to evolutionary/ naturalistic options pseudoscientists?"
"What about evolutionists who approach origins science with the conclusion that only naturalsitic options be allowed?"
You possibly misunderstood my above statements when you said:
"Well, you are assuming these exist. Please name one who has without examining creationist 'evidence', taken this stand."
My point was that many evolutionists apriori limit themselves to materialistic explanations/ conclusions and exclude creation as a possible conclusion in their origins research. Though some have examined creationist evidence, their philosophy of interpretation causes them to exclude the creation alternative as a possible conclusion. Therefore they limit themselves only to naturalsistic/ evolutionary possibilities in their research.