Huge group orgies allowed in the bible?

by adamgraziano 11 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • adamgraziano
    adamgraziano

    2 Chronicles, Chapter 11, verse 21:

    "Rehoboam loved Maacah daughter of Absalom more than any of his other wives and concubines. In all, he had eighteen wives and sixty concubines, twenty-eight sons and sixty daughters."

    WOW!!! - Now that's is alot of wives.

    When I asked my mother why it was ok for men to have more than one wife back in the bible days she said: " because there weren't many people on the earth back then and they had to populate it fast". -lol (She was a JW at the time)

    So what is wrong with having more than one wife in today's society?,

    and why do jehovahs witnesses condem it?

    Because don't some countries still have have men with many wives?

    (im confused).......

  • shera
    shera

    Well,today I suppose they take turns for their horny husband.

    I'm not sure if they all slept together at once back then (or a few at once)....we may never know.

  • Maverick
    Maverick

    Because Lawyers would not make as much money on divorces if a man had more than one wife! Maverick

  • adamgraziano
  • Sirona
    Sirona

    Adam,

    Off topic: you look a bit like the Fonz. Actually, that isn't as off topic as I thought it would be...we are talking about men who have lots of women...

    Sirona

  • shamus
    shamus

    Actually, I was thinking Ben Stiller.

  • funkyderek
    funkyderek

    So what is wrong with having more than one wife in today's society?,

    Because then you'd have more than one mother-in-law

  • shotgun
    shotgun

    Your mother's answer is a usual dub response, glad she is no longer one btw.

    When I asked my mother why it was ok for men to have more than one wife back in the bible days she said: " because there weren't many people on the earth back then and they had to populate it fast". -lol (She was a JW at the time)

    The correct answer is easy....Jehovah likes to kill people in mass numbers and to do this on a regular basis you need to repopulate fast as dubs assert.

  • TheOldHippie
    TheOldHippie

    "they had to populate it fast"

    I saw that argument in a WT recently, too, but I don't get it. Why not? Because it is the women who give birth, and theycan only give birth for example once a year. And whether there is one guy and 100 women or 100 guys and 100 women, each and every one of the women still cannot give birth more than once a year!

    How can being married to many women raise the population more than if one man is married to only one woman?

  • stillajwexelder
    stillajwexelder

    In theory , men fight wars (often over women actually if you look at history) so more men get killed (yes I know in the bible the bloodthirsty Jehovah in many cases did not spare women or children either). The result was there were more women and less men -- now it only requires one man to fertilize many women - but as has correctly been pointed out , the rate determining step for repopulation (to fight yet even more wars) is the number of women. So as there were more women than men it was deemed OK for men to have a lot of women - but not the otherway around - -you can tell God is male can't you?

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit