Hi Gopher,
Thanks for your reply! I found it really thot-provoking!
In case you were wondering, I am in BC, Canada, just so no one thinks I am making this up in some magical realm of nonexistence. J
To your specific points, my gf (soon to be fiancée J) and I, when staying late into the night at her place, we would be talking, cuddling, watching movies, etc, nothing that would cross the line, herein my cong, the elders get involved if someone goes to them with a specific case, either they know someone else was having sex etc, or they themselves felt they went too far (this standard differs from person to person, as there is no real definition of what too far is) so, since me and her weren’t having sex, there is no wrong doing, and if anyone asked, that is what I have told them, in fact some people have questioned me about it, almost casually, and i always respond with “yeah, I was there last night, watching movies or hanging out, so what?” or “yeah, we went to a movie and dinner” we are doing nothing wrong, so there is no need for any trouble.
As for sports teams my gf thinks that as long as she devotes enough time to study, which she does, (did, since she is now gradded) then she is fine, and she is.
We both are university educated (I took 3 years) and she is still attending, I have always, and vocally, stated to many people in the cong whenever a statement about university was made negatively. I (and many others around here) are never impressed with the 14yr old pioneers and crap like that at the assemblies. I always hear elders saying “she should go to school, learn about the way the world works” etc etc. I realize it is not like this everywhere, indeed when i visited australia, they were significantly more anal about being a pioneer.
I am well regarded in our cong, as you point out, I am at the age where I am being considered for MS, I do the sound, mics reading for the WT etc.
I hate both extremes, I hate the overly conservative, who don’t budge in their beliefs at all, or think for themselves, one sister said tome to justify her argument was “read the articling the awake” that is so incredibly dumb, think for yourselves people!! I have thought for myself, and my beliefs are inline with the JW doctrine, some of their actions in everyday living I take issue with, but to me, that’s personal jurisdiction, I decide how to run my life outside of the pervue of the cong. As long asi don’t violate a scriptural command, I am good.
I also take issue with ppl (many on this board)who assume because of one persons imperfections, that all witnesses are sheep or thoughtless people, just trying to shun everyone or cover crimes etc. we, like any group, is made up of a large gamut of people with their own problems, and unique qualities.
Hope I can keep peoples minds open, on both sides of the debate! J