Ok. First, as usual we must define the word, in this case, "Angel". I will highlight those definitions that Jesus fits.
DEFINITION:
Angel n [L.angelus; Gr angelos, a messenger]
1. Literally, a messenger [Rare]
2. A spirit, or a spiritual being, employed by God, according to the Scriptures, to communicate his will to man.
3. A ministering or guiding spirit.
4. A conventionalied image of a white-robed figure in human form with wings and a halo
5. A minister of the gospel, or pastor as the angel of the church at Ephesus
6. A person regarded as beautiful, good, innocent etc.
7. An English gold coin current in the fifteenth, sixteenth, and seventeenth centuries; so called from bearing on its obverse a figure of the archangel Michael piercing a dragon.
8. An angelfish
9. A person who provides the money for the destruction of a play , etc [Slang]
- Websters Dictionary 2nd edition (Back to top)
More discussion here:
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Rhodes/9813/#def
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Rhodes/9813/
http://www.tabernacletypology.com/spiritworld/definition_of_an_angel.htm
My attempt is not to tell you what an Angel is in your definition, only to explain my definition, and why I define Jesus as an Angel.
As I previously mentioned, Jesus is many other unique things as well, including mediator, the means through which God created all things (except Jesus and God himself), etc. But I repeat myself.
So perhaps our disagreement is a semantic one on the issue of whether Jesus is an "Angel"?
However, even if I accept an alternate definition, such as one where you categorize Angels, or Spirit Creatures:
Ambrose | Gregory the Great | John of Damascus | Pseudo-Dionysius | Billy Graham |
1. Seraphim | 1. Seraphim | 1. Seraphim | Triadic 1a. Seraphim | 1.Archangels |
2. Cherubim | 2. Cherubim | 2. Cherubim | 1b. Cherubim | 2.Angels |
3. Powers | 3.Thrones | 3.Thrones | 1c. Thrones | 3.Seraphim |
4. Dominions | 4. Dominions | 4. Dominions | Triadic 2a. Dominions | 4.Cherubim |
5. Thrones | 5. Principalities | 5. Powers | 2b. Powers | 5.Principalities |
6. Archangels | 6. Powers | 6. Authorities | 2c. Authorities | 6.Authorities |
7. Angels | 7. Virtues | 7. Rulers | Triadic 3a. Principalities | 7. Powers |
8. Archangels | 8. Archangels | 3b. Archangels | 8.Thrones | |
9. Angels | 9. Angels | 3c. Angels | 9.Might | |
10.Dominion |
I've already stated that Jesus is second only to God (Hebrews 1), that he has authority over all the other Angels (or Spirit creatures, if you like), except for God, YHWH.
We could then further clarify the situation in question (Is Jesus God):
1 Corinthians 15:20-28: 20 But Christ has indeed been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep. 21 For since death came through a man, the resurrection of the dead comes also through a man. 22 For as in Adam all die, so in Christ all will be made alive. 23 But each in his own turn: Christ, the firstfruits; then, when he comes, those who belong to him. 24 Then the end will come, when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father after he has destroyed all dominion, authority and power. 25 For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. 26 The last enemy to be destroyed is death. 27 For he "has put everything under his feet." [3] Now when it says that "everything" has been put under him, it is clear that this does not include God himself, who put everything under Christ. 28 When he has done this, then the Son himself will be made subject to him who put everything under him, so that God may be all in all.
Philippians 2:9-11:
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place
and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow,
in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord,
to the glory of God the Father.
So, your original intent to deify the Son is proven wrong. I trust you are familiar with the fact that the Trinity Doctine arose from the Nicean Council, roughly 300 years after Christ's death. Jesus Christ, and His Apostles, made his nature clear- not God. We could argue tthe Trinity from now 'till the cows come home. I'm well read and researched on the subject, and I frankly find it grasping at straws, full of convoluted reasoning. So I won't beat that one to death, because other threads have already done so, and the evidence is overwhelming that YHWH is God, not Jesus Christ, although he may rightly be called a god.
Here's the good news- I can't see where believing either way afffects salvation. It's not a salvation issue, more a doctine of division. Christ promoted unity, so I've said enough already.
Cheers,
Love_Truth