60 Minutes Tonight--Interesting

by patio34 40 Replies latest social current

• 

  patio34

  From Buzzflash.com: Watch 60 Minutes on Sunday: Another Ex-Bush Aide Accuses Bush and Rumsfeld of Being Obsessed with Iraq at the Expense of the War on Terrorism. Bush Turns Lies and Failure to Protect Us Into an Excuse for More Lies and Failure to Protect Us.
• 

  Simon

  Interesting reading !

  It seems to match the facts know and how people have behaved in general.
• 

  little witch

  Interesting reading,

  sounds like a match of sour grapes. Guess its all in how one percieves it.

  More interesting is the fact this comes from a Fired individual shortly before the election.
• 

  Yerusalyim

  Also interesting that this individual was a Clintonite before he went to work for Bush.
• 

  patio34

  LW and Yeru,

  I personally would rather watch it for myself rather than having preconceived, ill-formed prejudices about it. Wouldn't a sensible person want to hear a witness in court before forming opinions? I don't give a whit whether he was a "Clintonite," Yeru, as I'm not a Democrat either.

  Pat
• 

  Greenpalmtreestillmine

  Also interesting that this individual was a Clintonite before he went to work for Bush.

  Clark worked for the Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton, and Bush 2 Administrations.

  By your standard he was also a Reagonite and a Bushite twice!

  Sabrina
• 

  SixofNine

  It's looking more and more as if Bush wanted an incident... a catalyst to get the ball rolling for his pre-planned war on Iraq. Some broken eggs to start his omelette.
• 

  patio34

  Hi ya Six,

  One could certainly draw that conclusion and not be irrational. Mm-hm.

  Pat
• 

  wednesday

  all this shows me is the democarts don't have a clue how to fight fair, and have nothing really to offer. All they can do is fight dirty and try and inflame Bush hatred. Kerry is behind this, and not the guy i want runniing this governmet. And it is a long way before novemmber 2.
• 

  SixofNine

  What a attitude Wed. Do you really think the country is better off sticking it's collective head in the sand? Shall we pretend this smirking frat-boy in the White House is qualified to lead? Should we pretend he's doing a good job?

  How exactly is this "fighting dirty"? Please, please tell me. It looks to me like fair criticism. Fair criticism that the American public NEEDS to know about. Make the case that it isn't.