Fluff: What your topic to post ratio says about YOU

by Sirona 41 Replies latest jw friends

• 

  Tatiana

  112 pages of posts--6 pages of topics.

  I'm 18.4

  You are a fairly balanced contributor to the forum. You start threads and you also participate in everyone else?s discussions, after all, we?ve all got something to contribute, right? You probably know everyone quite well and you are well loved. (don't know about that.....my feminism annoys some)

  The people who irritate you are those who just joined the forum yesterday and they act as though they know everyone and everything. I mean, how dare they? -You have worked to gain this status and so must they!

  But, hey, we are only allowed two topics per day. Sometimes, like last night, I wanted to start another discussion, but I couldn't. Does that count???
• 

  funkyderek

  I looked at their stats before I posted and had them in mind!

  Well, that's how most mystics make predictions!

  LOL. FD, you are not devilish, but you do tend to look for holes in everyone's arguments

  That's true, but I can't find them if they aren't there. Anyway, if I didn't do that, I'd probably still be a JW

  (and you're bloody good at it too, you lil git - God you nearly turned me atheist at one point)

  Hehe, didn't realise I was that good! I'm going to keep trying anyway - I don't think I'll succeed but it'll keep you on your toes
• 

  Valis

  24?
• 

  frankiespeakin

  Sirona,

  I just did a count on my topics started and then the total replys to those specific topics and got an average of 24.31 replys per topic.

  I think that says you rule,or theory may be fairy accurate,,,,but,,,,I think you have to concider that some of us may not have ready access to a computer as often as other posters,, so the rule should be only a very ruff estimate,,of a persons personality.

  The way I look at it is..You need to get a survey where people tell you how much time they are at a computer where they can both read(guestimate), and post then get that average,,so that a person can adjust his figures according to where they think they are on the average.
• 

  Puternut

  Ratio: 31

  You browse a lot and contribute to the forum where you can. You participate more in other people?s discussions than starting threads. The threads you start are on-topic and / or very relevant to your life. The thing is, you care about the other people here, not just yourself, so you spend more time talking with them than thinking up new topics. This shows that you are a lovely person at heart. Whilst you like the fun part of the forum, you don?t like forum contributors who cause trouble by posting baited topics. Down with the trolls!

  Puteraverage
• 

  Soledad

  20.5 but I dont really think it describes me.maybe
• 

  micheal

  I'm at 21.
• 

  Fe2O3Girl

  Interesting one!

  My ratio is 24.

  I also calculated the average number of replies to my topics: 14.

  The largest response I ever got was with my first post, which got 46 replies. We can therefore deduce that the fact that I exist at all is more interesting than anything I have had to say since.

  If you take that "46" out of the calculations my average number of replies per topic is 12.

  What does the number of replies per topic say about you?

  Clue: I have never started a political thread, posted anything obscene, asked intimate questions about board users' sex lives, or posted a blank post or "test" or "do not reply".

  I'll start the ball rolling:

  0-20 replies per topic: You are boring. Noone knows who you are and your topics have the wit and originality of a 3 day old sandwich.
• 

  frankiespeakin

  Fe,

  0-20 replies per topic: You are boring. Noone knows who you are and your topics have the wit and originality of a 3 day old sandwich.

  Well I find that a bit negative,,for example,, some one could post a very interesting topic, that is far from boring, and get little in the way of replies or reads. Or some one start a thread that is truley original,,but the subject content may be something that the average joe may not feel comfortable commenting on because he knows so little about the subject,,so they refrain.
• 

  Leolaia

  I know.....hardly anyone posted on my recent threads on relics of the biblical giants and on the WT taking a pro-war pro-US stance in 1918, and I thought those were interesting....*shrug*