In the same vein (no pun intended) it is interesting to note the marked difference between these two quotes:
“Eusebius, a third century writer who is considered the “father of Church history,” relates what occurred in Lyons (now in France) in the year 177 C.E. Religious enemies falsely accused Christians of eating infants. During the torture and execution of some Christians, a girl named Biblias responded to the false accusation, saying: “How can we eat infants—we, to whom it is not lawful to eat the blood of beasts.”"
(Jehovah’s Witnesses and the Question of Blood, 1977, p. 13)
“Eusebius tells of a young woman near the end of the second century who, before dying under torture, made the point that Christians “are not allowed to eat the blood even of irrational animals.” She was not exercising a right to die. She wanted to live, but she would not compromise her principles. Do you not respect those who put principle above personal gain?”
(How Can Blood Save Your Life? 1990 p. 5)
As hawk has noted, the clear implication in the second quote is that Biblias died as a result of a refusal to eat blood - which is completely untrue.
Tom