You see, it is a lesson on efficiency. It is a business model. Eliminate all that do not contribute to the greater good (the bottom dollar). Members with problems or needs are not contributing to the goal. Eliminate them...It is a weakness that must be cut out like a cancer.
I saw this with the poor ones in the congo--the ones who were truly needy. It was always stressed that we needed to carry our own load. When I was on my way out of the Org I knew of a sister who was "inactive" (horrors) because she was a single mom, had health problems, was poor and depressed and worked full time. She didn't have the energy to go to meetings or to do anything for the congo, but she herself needed help. I could see that people avoided her because they knew this and would only comment on how she should be doing more to encourage her kids into the Org. One of her kids told me that at one point she ran out of food and called an elder and told him the situation asking for help (she had to swallow a lot to do this). The elder told her that they couldn't help her because she was "inactive." She was forced to go to a food bank run by another church to get food to feed her kids. I remember this same elder's wife telling me at an earlier time that it was too bad she was inactive, because now she wouldn't be getting any help from the congo. I do think that some others in the congo (including myself) would have brought her some food if we knew, but it would not be under the direction or approval of our fearless leaders (the elders) to do so. Can you feel the love???