My Governer is gay

by RR 83 Replies latest social current

  • NeonMadman
    NeonMadman
    In Europe, no one would care about the Governors sexual orientation. The fact that he was unfaithful to his wife would be "handled" and dismissed; life would go on. the job favoritism would become the issue, as I suspect it will here.

    I suspect you are absolutely right about that, and I don't think the reaction will be much different here than it would have been in Europe (we are talking about New Jersey, after all, not traditionally a very conservative state). I can see the job favoritism as a big issue, also from what I've read, it looks likely to me that McGreevy's lover may have been trying to blackmail him, and that could easily become a criminal matter. What other secrets may come out remain to be seen, but remember that McGreevy's administration had hardly been scandal-free before this issue arose.

    The other area where I see McGreevy as likely to take some heat is from the obvious political maneuver of delaying his resignation until November 15, because an earlier resignation would have mandated a special election in which the people of New Jersey would actually have had the opportunity to choose their new governor. As it is, the Democrats will manage to bypass the will of the people and maintain power.

    The media and the fundamentalist Christians; the right wing and THE JEHOVAHS WITNESSES will make a big issue of this.

    I suppose some might, but as a Christian myself, I don't think it's all that big a deal. Yes, the Bible calls homosexual behavior a sin, as it does many other behaviors. Was there ever any doubt that McGreevy was a sinner? So his sin is different than mine, so what? Frankly, I'm more impressed now by McGreevy's forthrightness about himself and his situation than I ever was by anything he did as governor. Of course, the other issues we have been discussing demonstrate that it is better for him to step down, but not particularly because he is gay.

    I certainly have more respect for McGreevy at this point than for Bill Clinton, who, while apparently 100% heterosexual, was willing to lie and stonewall through his scandals, even to the point of perjuring himself - anything to maintain power.

  • Pleasuredome
    Pleasuredome

    LT, yes i have 1 gay, and 1 bi-sexual friend. sssssssshhhh! dont tell anyone.

  • StinkyPantz
    StinkyPantz
    yes i have 1 gay, and 1 bi-sexual friend.

    That you know of .

  • Sunnygal41
    Sunnygal41
    More than likely, so is your president.

    Um, that was insensitive, Preston, considering that many people on JWD are gay and lesbians, and many more are bi-sexual. But, you may be a newbie, so you don't know this yet. I agree with the rest who have posted, it shouldn't be about being gay, it should be about the dishonesty that he perpetrated on his wife.

    Terri

  • LittleToe
    LittleToe

    PD:
    No hetero ones??

    Sunny:
    I think you may need to do a little research on Preston's orientation.

  • StinkyPantz
    StinkyPantz
    PD:No hetero ones??

    LOL!!!!

  • Sunnygal41
    Sunnygal41

    Sorry, Preston. Obviously you must be either gay or bi, considering Ross's comment to me.

    Ross, I don't usually check. It doesn't matter to me, that's why. From now on, I guess I need to.

    Again, my apologies to Preston, for my lack of knowledge. Darn internet and it's lack of facial expressions!

    Terri

  • Soledad
    Soledad

    let's get this straight (no pun intended, I swear!)

    • McGreevy installed him as the state's liaison to the Department of Homeland Security. He's an Israeli citizen.
    • He hadn't passed security clearances prior to assuming his duties, therefore the FBI and other agencies didn't want to share secrets with him---and the governor knew this
    • He makes $110,000 per year and he has no prior experience of any kind in fighting terrorism (his past employement--public relations)

    so the governor resigns cause he's gay??? does this make sense to anyone?

  • Pleasuredome
    Pleasuredome

    PD:No hetero ones??
    nah, just homo ones. they love me

  • myauntfanny
    myauntfanny

    amac

    Marriage vows are very important, more important than a temporary term in office. I say this meaning the vow itself is more binding (unless you went with non-traditional vows about loving your mate more than chocolate.) So to treat such an important vow with disregard is a reflection on that person and how they will view other vows and promises.

    But we don't know what sort of vows they made, or what was their starting agreement, spoken or unspoken, or what happened during the relationship, or who did what to whom first. It's all very private and no one is ever in a position to really even judge whether or not anyone broke a promise, or made one they couldn't keep in the first place, in a relationship.

    If they decided to treat marriage as a hope more than a promise, as many people do if they've been married before, then they might not have violated any vows. Marriages are really personal and I don't think non-participants can judge either party on the rest of their performance, particularly a public performance, based on a marriage breaking up.

    Besides, if you promise your kid to go swimming on the weekend and it rains all weekend and the swimming pool is closed and you can't, that doesn't mean you will steal pencils at work on Monday. As a general rule. We can't always keep our promises and that doesn't make us bad people, just imperfect. IMHO, of course.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit