NEW BOOK EXCERPT..WORTH NOTING. (page 3)

seattleniceguy

What if they came out with a new doctrine called "publisher's DFing"? It would work kind of like a citizen's arrest. Basically, anybody can DF anybody else that they perceive as not pleasing Jehovah. Man, what chaos would ensue...

SNG

blondie

Can't change 1914 without changing 1919 when Jesus pours out his spirit on the WTS, at least that is what they say.

purplesofa

lol SNG, Don't borrow trouble!!!!

Klaus Vollmer

They make it simple to disfellowship someone. maybe when finding out that he/she is writing here in this board or giving any critical commentary regarding the 10 year quicky with the UN as NGO.

They learn nothing and they get judged by their own methods.

While being busy that they keep their congragation clean they dont notify that already a great share has "terminated" their membership by staying regulary away.

The KHs are rather empty, the JWs habve time for everything e.g vacances - but not for more preaching.

I think most of them live a double life - one for the metings and one for the own interests.

Watchttower has given an excellent example with the ngo thing

what_Truth?

It doesn't really matter if the person has DF'd or DA'd gets a trial. Those things are kangaroo courts of the worst type anyway

minimus

The difference when a person is "disassociated" vs. "disfellowshipped" is----------a judicial committee is formed when a person is df'd. No JUDICIAL committee is formed when one is considered "disassociated". The one "disassociated" basically, by his course or actions, SHOWS he no longer is a JW.....Now, that allows the local elders to determine (by Society guidelines) whether someone has qualified himself to be determined as "disassociated".

integ

Loveis said:

this quote is not new;

I didn't realize that was the societies stance in '83. I never read THAT book. But not to rain on YOUR parade, but the way they announce the Df'ing and Da'ing IS NEW.

Thanks,

Integ.

NEW BOOK EXCERPT..WORTH NOTING.