I tend to agree with Almost. You guys would have had to have pretty much the same reaction to JC and his 12.
LJ, I don't actually feel the way I presented this topic, I stated it that way to try to take the "other side" of the issue. I tried my best to imagine why someone might stay despite knowing the truth about "The Truth", but I don't buy it myself.
It's easier to imagine the Watchtower paralleling with the Pharisees than it is with Jesus. They made up rules that had no scriptural support, ostensibly for the "protection" of the Jews, though Jesus showed it had more to do with their own ego. I think it's true that many people here on JWD would have taken the same attitude toward the Pharisees that they take today toward the Watchtower, but I don't think as many would reject Jesus outright if they lived then.
So again, how can a person comfortably associate with the Watchtower knowing the outright lies they tell and continue to tell? They've never admitted to misquoting all the authors whose words they yanked out of context to make it appear to say something it doesn't. They continue to hold to their death-dealing unscriptural blood policy, despite attempts to water it down over the years. They've never owned up to the mexico miltary-official bribery scandal. It's one thing to make a mistake, like King David. But when Nathan pointed it out, David repented. When we point it out, we're labelled "apostate" and are disfellowshipped.
That's why I can't understand it. Can you explain it, beyond simply saying, "There's some good in it"? After all, there's probably some good in the Ku Klux Klan, but I wouldn't use that reasoning to associate with them.
Dave