I always wondered why we were not spending the money to build halls in remote and poor areas that needed them - but instead we would build new halls and sell old ones in places where we were seeing little growth.
Every congregation in this area has built a new hall in the past 20 or so years. Yet the congs are the same basic size they were before. Most have had a least one major remodel since building new. I have read all the theories on why it is encouraged in terms of money in the hands of Crooklyn.
Did anyone else ever question this while in - I did, and openly, to the gasps of the congregation while discussing spending a hundred grand [in 1986] to build a hall we didn't need in the first place, and then later for the remodel another 150 grand.
Did this bother you? That our 'brothers' in places far away were meeting in open fields and jungles and walking for two days to get to a meeting, and we were building a new building that was not needed?
Jeff