Why is there no hospitality after the meetings like they have in the churches?
Interestingly, I have attended some Bible Student Sunday meetings and they have potluck, especially when the featured speaker has had to travel a long ways.
2. Why have to spend more time with these people?
3. We can't afford to buy the teabags.
4. It's wrong to use congregation funds to buy tea, coffee and biscuits.The brothers are very stingy when it comes to spending the money on the rank and file.
5. The elders don't want to oversee the 'arrangement'.
6. Sisters would have to serve tea under the direction of a brother - and we don't have any spare for trivialities.
7. What's hospitality?
8. What a waste of time!
9. What a waste of money!
10. It would interfere with the elders' meetings
11. It would interfere with the committee meetings.
12. We'd get crumbs in the carpet!
I can remember on circuit that had the pioneer school in a KH and had to serve food in the foyer/magazine counter area. They were so worried that this adult JWs were going to get food on the carpet.
13. Who'd organise it?
14. Who'd prepare the schedule?
15. No-one wants to buy the milk.
16. One of the sisters reckons that its caffeine addictive and we don't want to stumble her.
17. We don't have an urn.
18. We don't have room for it.
19. We'll think of anything not to do it!
20. Other (please detail)I have found that the women in the congregation love to organize food and what not for gatherings. Goodie nights at book studies are conceived and executed by the sisters.
Another point, churches are equipped for serving food, having kitchens and dining areas. KHs are deliberately designed without that because they don’t want to be like Christendom; afraid that events will revolve around literal food rather than spiritual food.
Not much like the man who provided food for thousands through a miracle. Not like the early Christians who had food at their meetings to help out the poor, hungry Christians, called love feasts.
w64 8/15 p. 490 The Identifying Mark of Love ***
Yet, among true early Christians in general, we may be certain that, whatever was their nature, these feasts were attended by the display of brotherly love. No, they were not obligatory. The Scriptures do not make them so and hence such "love feasts" have not been revived by true Christians today.
yb75
p. 58 United States of America (Part One) ***Early Christians sometimes held "love feasts," but the Bible does not describe them. (Jude 12) Some think they were occasions when materially prosperous Christians held banquets to which they invited their poorer fellow worshipers. But the Scriptures do not make "love feasts" obligatory, whatever their early nature, and so they are not in vogue among true Christians today. Blondie