TO ALL BODIES 0F ELDERS - July 1, 1989

by Kent 17 Replies latest jw friends

  • Kent
    Kent

    Just a reminder to those who never did read this:

    PS: Hello Watchtower Legal Dep! I guess you love this:

    ----------------------

    WATCHTOWER
    BIBLE AND TRACT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK, INC.
    25 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK 11201, LISA PHONE (718)625-3600

    July 1, 1989

    BODIES OF ELDERS IN THE UNITED STATES
    CONFIDENTIAL
    Dear Brothers:
    We are writing to help all of you as individual elders be aware of a growing concern regarding the handling of your duties that may involve legal issues or questions. Due to its importance, the presiding overseer should arrange for a special meeting of the body of elders to read and consider this letter carefully.
    In spreading the Kingdom message, it is appropriate that we be bold and outspoken. Jesus commanded that "what you hear whispered, preach from the housetops." (Matthew 10:27) Even when worldly authorities demand that we keep silent, we reply as did the apostles: "We cannot stop speaking about the things we have seen and heard." (Acts 4:20) The Christian congregation will continue to declare the Kingdom message boldly until Jehovah says the work is done.
    Elders share the obligation to shepherd the flock. However, they must be careful not to divulge information about personal matters to unauthorized persons. There is "a time to keep quiet," when "your words should prove to be few." (Ecclesiastes 3:7; 5:2) Proverbs 10:19 warns: "In the abundance of words there does not fail to be transgression, but the one keeping his lips in check is acting discreetly." Problems are created when elders unwisely reveal matters that should be kept confidential. Elders must give special heed to the counsel: "Do not reveal the confidential talk of another." (Proverbs 25:9) Often the peace, unity, and spiritual well-being of the congregation are at stake. Improper use of the tongue by an elder can result in serious legal problems for the individual, the congregation, and even the Society.
    While we as Christians are ready to forgive others who may wrong us, those in the world are not so inclined. Worldly persons are quick to resort to lawsuits if they feel their "rights" have been violated. Some who oppose the Kingdom preaching work readily take advantage of any legal provisions to interfere with it or impede its progress. Thus, elders must especially guard the use of the tongue. Jesus faced opposers who tried to "catch him in speech, so as to turn him over to the government." (Luke 20:20) He instructed us to be "cautious as serpents and yet innocent as doves" in such situations. (Matthew 10:16) Where such a threat exists, our position as elders should be in line with David's words: "I will set a muzzle as a guard to my own mouth, as long as anyone wicked is in front of me."-Psalm 39:1.

    TO ALL BODIES OF ELDERS July 1, 1989 Page 2
    In recent years, this matter has come to be a cause for increasing concern. The spirit of the world has sensitized people regarding their legal "rights" and the legal means by which they can exact punishment if such "rights" are violated. Hence, a growing number of vindictive or disgruntled ones, as well as opposers, have initiated lawsuits to inflict financial penalties on the individual, the congregation, or the Society. Many of these lawsuits are the result of the misuse of the tongue. As elders, remember that ill-advised statements or actions on your part can sometimes be interpreted legally as violating others' "rights."
    The need for elders to maintain strict confidentiality has been repeatedly stressed. Please see The Watchtower of April l, 1971, pages 222-4, and September I, 1987, pages 12-15. The September 1977 OUR KINGDOM SERVICE, page 6, paragraph 36, and the ks7J text- book , page 65, also "provide helpful direction and counsel. That material strongly emphasized the elders' responsibility to avoid revealing confidential information to those not entitled to it.
    The legal consequences of a breach of confidentiality by the elders can be substantial. If the elders fail to follow the Society's direction carefully in handling confidential matters, such mistakes could result in successful litigation by those offended. Substantial monetary damages could be assessed against the elders or congregation. In some cases where the authorities are involved, certain complications could lead to a fine or imprisonment. These possibilities underscore the need for elders to be discerning and to follow carefully directions provided by the Society.
    I. WHAT TO DO IN SPECIFIC CASES
    II. A. Judicial Committee Matters
    Judicial committees must follow carefully the Society's instructions in carrying out their duties. (Note ks77, pages 66-70; ks81, pages 160-70.) Anything submitted in writing to the committee by the alleged wrongdoer or by witnesses should be kept in strict confidence. If it is necessary to continue at a later time a commit- tee hearing, the members of the committee should submit to the chair- man any personal notes they have taken. The chairman will keep these notes in a secure place to prevent breaches of confidentiality. The notes may be returned to the individual elders when the hearing resumes. Upon conclusion of the case, the chairman should place only necessary notes and documents, a summary of the case, and the S-77 forms in a sealed envelope for the congregation file. Nothing should be preserved outside of this sealed envelope (including unnecessary personal notes) by any elder on the committee. Obviously, no committee will ever allow judicial proceedings to be tape recorded or allow witnesses testifying before the committee to take notes.

    TO ALL BODIES OF ELDERS July 1, 1989 Page 3
    B. Child Abuse
    Many states have child abuse reporting laws. When elders receive reports of physical or sexual abuse of a child, they should contact the Society's Legal Department immediately. Victims of such abuse need to be protected from further danger.-See "If the Worst Should Happen," AYl.Qk..e.1- January 22, 1985, page 8.
    C. Search Warrants and Subpoenas
    1. A search warrant is a court order authorizing the police to search premises to locate evidence that may be used in a criminal prosecution. No elder should ever consent to the search of a Kingdom Hall or any other place where confidential records are stored. How- ever, armed with a search warrant the police do not need consent and may even use force to accomplish their task. Likely before obtaining a search warrant, the police or other governmental officials will
    make inquiries regarding confidential records, make request to obtain the records, or indicate that they will seek a search warrant if the elder(s) involved does not cooperate. In any such situation, the Society's Legal Department should be called immediately.
    At any time an elder is confronted with a search warrant (whether given advance notice or not) , the elder should first ask to read the warrant. After reading it he should ask if he can call for legal guidance and then call the Society's Legal Department. If for some reason the Legal Department cannot be contacted, the elders involved should make every effort to obtain the assistance of a local attorney for the purpose of protecting the confidentiality of the records. It may be impossible to stop determined officers from conducting the search authorized by the warrant. Conscientious elders will want to do all they reasonably and peaceably can to preserve the confidentiality of the congregation in harmony with the principle set out in Acts 5:29.
    2. Subpoenas are demands for records or for the appearance or for the appearance of an individual at a trial or deposition to give testimony. Subpoenas may be issued by a court or in some cases by a governmental agency or an attorney. If an elder receives a subpoena, he should contact the Society's Legal Department immediately. Never turn over records, notes, documents, or reveal any confidential matter sought by subpoena without receiving direction from the Legal Department.
    D. Crimes and Criminal Investigations
    In some cases the elders will form judicial committees to handle alleged wrongdoing that also could constitute a violation of Caesar's criminal laws (e.g., theft, assault, etc.). Generally, a secular investigation into a matter that is a concern to the congregation should not delay conducting a judicial hearing. To avoid entanglement with the secular authorities who may be investigating the same matter, the strictest confidentiality (even of the fact that there is a committee) must be maintained.

    TO ALL BODIES OF ELDERS July I, 1989 Page 4
    If the alleged wrongdoer confesses to the sin (crime), no one else should be present besides the members of the committee. When evidence supports the accusation but genuine repentance is not displayed resulting in a decision to disfellowship, this should be handled in the normal course regarding advice of appeal rights and announcements to the congregation. In cases of serious criminal wrongdoing (e.g., murder, rape, etc.), or where the criminal conduct is widely known in the community, the body of elders should contact the Society before proceeding with the judicial committee process.
    E~ When Servants and Publishers Move
    A considerable number of publishers, including elders and ministerial servants move from one congregation to another. Sometimes the circumstances surrounding their departure are
    unsettled. Some appointed brothers may be experiencing problems that have brought their qualifications into question. It is not uncommon for a body of elders to hold back in giving counsel, allowing a brother to move without discussing his problem. Thereafter, they decline to recommend his reappointment in his new congregation. Often such a brother protests, requiring extensive correspondence between the bodies of elders. Much personal, and sometimes embar- rassing, information must then be passed on. Such mishandling of things greatly increases the potential for serious repercussions. Problems can be avoided by the body of elders assuming its responsibility to inform a brother that he will not be favorably recommended, fully explaining the reasons why. Every effort should be made to resolve any difference before he leaves, eliminating any need for controversy involving his new congregation. The body should assign two elders to meet with him before he moves, letting him know whether they are recommending him to the new congregation.
    This would likewise apply to publishers who move at a time when their personal conduct requires investigation by the elders. If serious accusations of wrongdoing have been made against an
    individual and he moves to another congregation before matters are finalized, usually it is best for the elders in the original congregation to follow through in handling matters, if possible and if distance permits. They are acquainted with the individual and the circumstances surrounding the alleged wrongdoing; this ordinarily puts them in the best position to get the facts and to handle the case. Handling matters in this way will eliminate the need to reveal confidential information unnecessarily about the private lives of individuals.
    F. When Lawsuits Are Threatened
    If the congregation or the elders (in their capacity as elders) are threatened with a lawsuit, the Society's Legal Department should be contacted immediately. No statements should be made by any member of the body of elders about the merits or validity of an actual or threatened lawsuit without authorization from the Society.

    TO ALL BODIES OF ELDERS July 1, 1989 Page 5
    G.. Child Custody
    Elders may learn that a publisher is facing a dispute over child custody in a divorce proceeding. If the parental rights of such is challenged on the basis of our Christian beliefs, or on the assertion that our beliefs are harmful to a child's best interests, the elders should immediately write to the Society's Legal Department. In a rare emergency, a telephone call may be necessary. The Legal Department will assess the facts and determine the degree of its involvement, if any. Elders have no authority to make any promises about the Society's paying legal fees or handling specific cases. There is no need to contact the Society if there is no indication that the beliefs and practices of Jehovah's Witnesses will be attacked in a child custody dispute.
    When you write to the Society's Legal Department about a specific case, please provide the following information:
    I. The names of the parents and their attorneys.
    2. The number of children involved and their ages.
    3. A brief description of the facts, including the presence of apostates.
    40 An assessment of the Christian parent's spiritual condition--Is he or she new in the truth? Active? Inactive? Balanced?
    5. The status of the legal proceedings--Has the matter gone to trial? Has the trial date been set? If so, when?
    II. POINTS TO REMEMBER
    A. Appreciate the Importance of Maintaining Confidentiality Elders must exercise extraordinary caution when it comes to handling confidential information about the private lives of others. Do not mistakenly minimize the gravity of a breach of confidentiality. Unauthorized disclosure of confidential information can result in costly lawsuits. Even if a lawsuit turns out
    favorably, valuable time and energy that could have been devoted to Kingdom interests will be lost.
    B. Do Not Make Statements to Secular Authorities Until You Receive Legal Advice from the Society
    You are not legally required to make immediate responses to secular authorities about matters that could involve the disclosure of confidential information. Voluntarily allowing the Kingdom Hall or confidential records to be searched, where no search warrant is produced, could infringe on the legal rights of the congregation or of others. No statements should be made until you have an understanding of your legal position from the Society's Legal Department.

    TO ALL BODIES OF ELDERS July 1, 1989 Page 6
    C. Be Extremely Careful with Written Material
    All material related to judicial matters should be kept in a safe place, accessible only to elders. Final reports on the handling of judicial matters should be placed in a sealed envelope in the congregation file. A judicial committee should avoid sending to an individual any kind of correspondence that accuses him of specific wrongdoing. (Note ks77, pages 68-9.) Nothing should be put in writing to any disfellowshipped person to advise him of his status or the 'reasons for it without specific direction from the Society. The rules and procedures of Jehovah's Witnesses do not require such written disclosures. Anything in writing submitted to a judicial committee should be kept in strict confidence. If a judicial committee disfellowships an individual, he should be informed orally of the action taken and of the right to appeal. If the wrongdoer refuses to attend the hearing, two members of the judicial committee should attempt to contact the individual at his home and inform him orally of the decision. If this is not possible, the two elders may be able to inform him by telephone.
    D. Guard the Use of Your Tongue
    Think before you speak. Do not discuss private and judicial matters with members of your family, including your wives, or with other members of the congregation. Be extremely careful not to inadvertantly disclose private information when others are present, such as when speaking on the telephone with others listening in or nearby. (Note ~, page 65.) At times, complicated judicial cases may necessitate consultation with an experienced, mature elder in another congregation or with the circuit overseer. Unless the circuit overseer is the elder consulted, only the pertinent details should be discussed and names should not be used.
    Elders bear a heavy responsibility in ministering to the needs of the Christian congregation, and observing confidentiality as they do so. (I Corinthians 16:13) We trust that the information in this letter will help you carry this burden. Please be assured of our love and prayers, and may Jehovah continue to bless you as you shepherd his flock.--l Peter 5:1-3.
    Your brothers,
    WTBS
    P.S. Due to the importance of the information that is presented herein it is suggested that the body of elders jointly read and consider this letter as soon as possible after its receipt in the congregation. Please do not make any copies of this letter, nor should it be read by others. It should be kept in the congregation's confidential files for any future reference that may be required by the body of elders.

    Source H2O: http://www.cyberpass.net/~h2o/wwwboard/messages/311300.html

    Yakki Da

    Kent

    "The only difference between God and Adolf Hitler is that God is more proficient at genocide."

    Daily News On The Watchtower and the Jehovah's Witnesses:
    http://watchtower.observer.org

  • Maximus
    Maximus

    Hmmmmm. 1989. Interesting year.

    Does anyone remember the elders' meeting with the district overseer who read a MS in which they were told to respond to subpoenas? Nothing would be found in the files, however! Wink, wink, nudge, nudge.

    One DO tells me he read it loyally, asked to make sure everyone got it, but he saw the stricken faces of some who realized that moral fiber had just weakened. Others were caught up in war strategy. He has been troubled since that day onward.

    Wonder how the public will feel about this attitude? And the courts?

    Maybe not all copies were destroyed ...

    Maximus

  • ozziepost
    ozziepost

    Yes, an interesting year. I'm sure there are many of us serving as elders who with the benefit of hindsight wonder how we didn't voice our concerns earlier. I guess it's true of us that there's none so blind..... Now we can see. Many of us want to try to correct what has been done in the past. If we were able to influence others back then, we sure as hell can do it now, but this time with eyes wide open.

    Cheers,
    Ozzie

    "There are two ways of moving men, interest and fear" Napoleon

  • Kent
    Kent
    Maybe not all copies were destroyed ...

    Let me say it this way. If a copy should by accident come to me, I'm sure many will get the chanse to read it!

    Yakki Da

    Kent

    "The only difference between God and Adolf Hitler is that God is more proficient at genocide."

    Daily News On The Watchtower and the Jehovah's Witnesses:
    http://watchtower.observer.org

  • outnfree
    outnfree

    How interesting that you should post this letter, Kent, when I was just reviewing it last night and shaking my head in utter disbelief!

    Some comments:

    Elders must give special heed to the counsel: "Do not reveal the confidential talk of another." (Proverbs 25:9) Often the peace, unity and spiritual well-being of the congregation are at stake. Improper use of the tongue by an elder can result in serious legal problems for the individual, the congregation, and even the Society. [italics mine]

    WHICH individual will have legal problems in the event of "loose lips?" If an elder speaks the truth, where is the culpability? How self-serving is the statement that the peace, unity and spiritual well-being of the congregation are at stake. If the elder knew of a confessed pedophile and tried to warn others in the congregation so that children were not at risk, would he be a slanderer? No! And while the unity of the congregation might suffer as parents took measures to shield their children from risk, the spiritual well-being of the congregation would best be served if the pedophile were expelled.

    While we as Christians are ready to forgive others who may wrong us, those in the world are not so inclined. Worldly persons are quick to resort to lawsuits if they feel their "rights" have been violated.

    Would someone please explain to me the difference between "rights" and rights? If a lawsuit has any merit, one's rights, not "rights"[so-called] HAVE been violated!

    And notice the siege mentality in the next sentence:

    Some who oppose the Kingdom preaching work readily take advantage of any legal provisions to interfere with it or impede its progress.

    Again, what is inherently wrong with availing oneself of legal remedy for a crime committed against one?

    The spirit of the world has sensitized people regarding their legal "rights" [there's those quotation marks again!] and the legal means by which they can exact punishment if such "rights" [ibid] are violated. Hence, a growing number of vindictive or disgruntled ones, as well as opposers, have initiated lawsuits to inflict financial penalties on the individual, the congregation or the Society.

    Why are the plaintiffs in any suit "vindictive," "disgruntled" or "opposers"? Could they not possibly be legitimate VICTIMS of a crime or fraud which was not properly handled by the congregation? Do sexually abused children and their parents have the right to be "disgruntled" at "the individual" molester, the elders in "the congregation" who may have covered over the abuse, or "the Society" for their dangerous internal policies for dealing with these pedophile predators?

    Many of these lawsuits are the result of misuse of the tongue.

    While I know the Society didn't mean it this way, could 'many of these lawsuits' have been instigated because the tongues of the elders were NOT used in a way that would benefit the spiritual well-being and moral quality of the congregation? Hmmmmmmm?

    It is far more likely that elders do NOT breathe a word about the accused or confessed pedophile. How many lawsuits for "slander" are brought against the Society because an elder talked too much?

    In fact, the breach of confidentiality the Society seems overly concerned about is likely this:

    A search warrant is a court order authorizing the police to search premises to locate evidence that may be used in a criminal prosecution. No elder should ever consent to the search of a Kingdom Hall or any other place where confidential records are stored. How- ever, armed with a search warrant the police do not need consent and may even use force to accomplish their task. Likely before obtaining a search warrant, the police or other governmental officials will
    make inquiries regarding confidential records, make request to obtain the records, or indicate that they will seek a search warrant if the elder(s) involved does not cooperate. In any such situation, the Society's Legal Department should be called immediately.
    At any time an elder is confronted with a search warrant (whether given advance notice or not) , the elder should first ask to read the warrant. After reading it he should ask if he can call for legal guidance and then call the Society's Legal Department. If for some reason the Legal Department cannot be contacted, the elders involved should make every effort to obtain the assistance of a local attorney for the purpose of protecting the confidentiality of the records. It may be impossible to stop determined officers from conducting the search authorized by the warrant. Conscientious elders will want to do all they reasonably and peaceably can to preserve the confidentiality of the congregation in harmony with the principle set out in Acts 5:29.

    Under the guise of perserving "the confidentiality of the congregation in harmony with the principle" 'In answer Peter and the [other] apostles said: "We must obey God as ruler rather than men.", the elders would obstruct justice? Not trust police officers to display professionalism and to maintain necessary confidentiality in "a criminal prosecution"?

    We all know that in states that do NOT require "clergy" reporting to the authorities, no report of alleged child abuse will occur. But
    the following is just downright despicable:

    D. Crimes and Criminal Investigations

    To avoid entanglement with the secular authorities who may be investigating the same matter, the strictest confidentiality (even of the fact that there is a committee) must be maintained.

    Now:

    If the alleged wrongdoer confesses to the sin (crime), no one else should be present besides the members of the committee.

    Why? SO THAT ELDERS CAN TRY TO INVOKE CLERGY-PENTITENT PRIVILEGE IN A COURT OF LAW SHOULD THE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION GO FORWARD, that's why!!!

    And only another Jehovah's Witness would understand THIS:

    When evidence supports the accusation but genuine repentance is not displayed resulting in a decision to disfellowship, this should be handled in the normal course regarding advice of appeal rights and announcements to the congregation.

    In other words, NOBODY in the congregation will be told that their children are at risk from the unrepentant molester -- not even fellow family members if the Watch Tower had its way! It will simply be announced that Brother or Sister XXXX has been disfellowshipped or the announcement will be held in abeyance until an appeal committee has ruled.

    And, of course, if Brother or Sister XXXX HAD confessed and been repentant, nothing would necessarily be done in the way of discipline either!

    How sick is that?!!!!

    Can we say EVIL?

    outnfree

  • Eusebius Hieronymus
    Eusebius Hieronymus

    outnfree, now tell us what you really think!

    Wait till the rank and file find out how much money from contribution boxes and sale of publications has been spent in legal situations, especially in settling cases out of court.

    "Ecclesiastical privilege."

    Coverup.

  • BoozeRunner
    BoozeRunner

    Hi Kent and all,

    The letter stated on page 5:

    "G.. Child Custody
    Elders may learn that a publisher is facing a dispute over child custody in a divorce proceeding. If the parental rights of such is challenged on the basis of our Christian beliefs, or on the assertion that our beliefs are harmful to a child's best interests, the elders should immediately write to the Society's Legal Department.
    When you write to the Society's Legal Department about a specific case, please provide the following information:
    I. The names of the parents and their attorneys.
    2. The number of children involved and their ages.
    3. A brief description of the facts, including the presence of apostates.
    40 An assessment of the Christian parent's spiritual condition--Is he or she new in the truth? Active? Inactive? Balanced?
    5. The status of the legal proceedings--Has the matter gone to trial? Has the trial date been set? If so, when?"

    This REALLY shows how much the WTS cares about children-not ONE word as to the childs safety!!! Its no wonder they hide pedophile with no shame. They dont care about children in any situation.

    Boozy

  • nelly136
    nelly136

    http://jehovah.to/legal/custody/index.htm

    carolyn r wah seems to do quite a lot of litigation/representation on behalf of the wtbts, be it to do with cesnur, holocaust, child custody cases,
    nelly

  • Eusebius Hieronymus
    Eusebius Hieronymus

    <carolyn r wah>

    Now there is a piece of work, the Legal Department at its finest.

    She has blabbed once too often, too much detail about how she has given the shiv to "whitey" and the Devil's spawn. That will come back to haunt her.

    Anybody know Carolyn? Or is Mr. Moreno more your type--you know, with the on-the-side business connections; insurance and all that.

  • nelly136

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit