These PR statements really made me sick.
First of all, they actually use the term "church elder" and I never thought I'd hear Brooklyn do that in the context they did.
Then I have to wonder about the elders serving on the judicial committees that end up unwittingly protecting the molesters. Are these committees hand-picked to include only men who have no children or families of their own? Even those with only nephews and neices or who are close to families with children would be hard-pressed to take no action. I would ask how anyone could be so cold and callous, but I only have to realize that it is actually a cult.
If this doesn't prove it, nothing else will.
Only a cult member would be so blindly loyal to their leadership as to sacrifice children in the interest of protecting the cult.
My dad was and is a long-time elder. Now I wonder how many cases of this kind he dealt with. I can almost bet the answer is more than none. I think of all the times he came home from an elders meeting discouraged to the point of rage. And I can only wonder.
I'm going to tape that Dateline show. I'm also (with Silentlamb's permission) going to get some major hard-copy from Silentlambs.com and Mom and Dad as well as a few others are going to get some anonymous bombshells in the mail!
Now if you all will excuse me, I have to find a way to get my appetite back before dinner.
You're doing a wonderful job Bill, thank you.
mike.