you included too much of the context in the quotes so that it is not Fair Use and constitutes infringement. Now, you apparently have not quoted ENOUGH of the context
That is exactly what I was thinking. I wonder what a judge would think if he reviewed the first complaint filed, saw that the site mentioned too much information, and then read this new complaint which says there's not enough(out of context), and asked the WTS lawyers, WTF? Could you please make up your mind?
In the end, I hope to god this goes to court and is drawn out to where everything gets aired in a public manner, and on the record of course. Something already tells me though that the WTS lawyers already have a rock solid plan in place to not let Quotes bring up anything doctrinally related in court. They will probably focus on the CDROM EULA and copyright issues. Both items are extremely business in nature and have nothing to do with religion. The less they drag religion into the courtroom, the better it will be for them. Quotes will have to find an excellent attorney that can bring the religious aspect into the courtroom. If he can accomplish that feat, the WTS will likely back down. They are not there to argue religious topics. They just want to pass go and collect that $100K.