Grouper, do I know you?
I have known Andrew Corbin for maybe 7 years. I met him on AOL. In fact I just recently mentioned him here on JWD a couple of days ago in response to a question by proplog2. Andrew indeed knows his stuff, and he indeed will make a good defense for JW christology (which is likely what this will be about; they both will agree that the Father is eternal and uncreated and nobody really cares about the holy spirit in such debates (trinitarians please don't flame me)). Andrew knows I am disfellowshipped but he will still chat with me, and on a personal level (e.g. how are you doing, how are your wife's college studies going, etc.).
I hope he does well in the debate and I stress debate for this reason. I bought and watched Greg Stafford's debate with Ron Bowman on DVD format last year and while Greg did a good job, I think he lost the debate on points. What I mean is, if you were scoring the debate, Bowman won, IMO. I would emotionally have sided with Greg but he didn't "win the debate."
I might add that Andrew, Greg, and another personal friend of theirs who is a JW used to tell me about some interesting behind-the-scenes goings-on in Watchtower apologist scholarly circles. I'm not going to relay much of it here, but one thing people might find interesting: I was told (in other words I did not verify this for myself) that there was a group of about 50 'scholarly type' JWs who were connected through the internet and communicated with Bethel's Writing Department. A schism in that group came about when Greg released Three Dissertations; some were for the book, some against, considering it apostate. My guess is that Andrew was deeply involved in that group [edited to add for clarification as my grammar was poor: of 50], and that may be one reason why he will receive no censure or discipline for participating in the scheduled debate.