Is it possible to not go off on a tangent, I would be interested in hearing a WT defender's response to the original question.
A very reasonable question, I might add.
while there are not too many currently defending the watchtower in this discussion forum, it happens from time to time.
and quite often, there may be new people and lurkers reading these discussions.
i just wanted you to ponder these questions.
Is it possible to not go off on a tangent, I would be interested in hearing a WT defender's response to the original question.
A very reasonable question, I might add.
i got to thinking the other day about how the wt uses loaded language.
and spin to give thinly veiled credence and so-called respectability to their policies.. but why not call a spade a spade.
why not identify the true nature of a policy,.
"How did you enjoy the meeting"= a statement disguised as a question, should actually read: "you have to enjoy the meeting...everyone does".
well i'll be darned.
serves 'em right.
man does that put a smile on my face.'.
Yes I remember when I first researched this, I found it very interesting.
Helped explain why we seem to focus so much on d2d work but let "weak" ones just slip away into oblivion.
In fact this info helped me to see that it wasn't me who "failed" them, but it was them who failed me.
i got to thinking the other day about how the wt uses loaded language.
and spin to give thinly veiled credence and so-called respectability to their policies.. but why not call a spade a spade.
why not identify the true nature of a policy,.
CO visit = the delicate "genius" and his wife are in town, let the brown-nosing begin.
"My return visit is coming along on sunday" = suck it !!!
were they pretty much a good group of men?
we're they jerks?.
They were awful, simply awful.
Old boys network, everything in the cong was arranged for their own families
convenience, while the rest of us could "go to buggery". Them and their
families treated the congregation and the KH like it was their own personal kingdom.
were they pretty much a good group of men?
we're they jerks?.
while there are not too many currently defending the watchtower in this discussion forum, it happens from time to time.
and quite often, there may be new people and lurkers reading these discussions.
i just wanted you to ponder these questions.
Why do you come here committee chairman?
Is it to "reason" or "witness" to us? I sincerely would like to know.
i got to thinking the other day about how the wt uses loaded language.
and spin to give thinly veiled credence and so-called respectability to their policies.. but why not call a spade a spade.
why not identify the true nature of a policy,.
Good one Lisa.
look up in the right-hand corner of this page.. find where it says welcome (name).. did you locate that?.
now click on your name and observe the new page loading takes you to a top blue bar with a menu.. it should read:.
active topics search members topics started .
By far, the thread I started that got the most responses was one
about capitol punishment, and that was because it started an arguement
between a couple of posters.lol.
i got to thinking the other day about how the wt uses loaded language.
and spin to give thinly veiled credence and so-called respectability to their policies.. but why not call a spade a spade.
why not identify the true nature of a policy,.
I got to thinking the other day about how the WT uses loaded language
and spin to give thinly veiled credence and so-called respectability to their policies.
But why not call a spade a spade. Why not identify the true nature of a policy,
action or behavior, the intent behind it. So, for instance, if we are being honest
*disfellowshipped = emotional balckmail, J-snubbed, hit with the shun-gun,
the "you are dead to me" treatment
*deleted = disgraced former elder
*The two witness rule= pedo loophole
*Judicial Committee=kangaroo court, a prosecution only trial, where the
prosecuting team are prosecuting attorney, jury and sentencing judge all in one.
*worldly= marked for destruction unless commits to lifelong GB worship.
These are just a few I could think of for the sake of example,but what about you,
do you think the language used has any bearing on how we view things?
Does calling it what it is help expose the true intent behind WT policies?
Spin of all kinds is nothing new, so I suppose what I am talking about here
is reverse-spin.