while there are not too many currently defending the watchtower in this discussion forum, it happens from time to time.
and quite often, there may be new people and lurkers reading these discussions.
i just wanted you to ponder these questions.
To The Chairman - It's not really about you though is it? You don't make the rules, write the articles or compose the talk outlines.
Your boss The GB does. Your'e just there undercover helping people, what a hero. You need to start wearing your undies on the
outside of your trousers and get a cape( sarcastic tone intended.)
Maybe they would set up a chat room that only "approved" ones can use?
I have no idea how it would work, but d2d work is so 1950.
from the feb 2015 km, page 2:.
have a publisher demonstrate how he.
prepares for the ministry by reviewing the tracts,.
Let' hope he hasn't got his porn ready to play to the householder by mistake.
Could make for an increase in "interest"-or the police get called.
Either way that would be fuuunny.
i think its pretty clear that the gb are power hungry.
you cannot listen to the branch visit and not see clear as day that there are some of them that are loving the power.
it showed the clearest with anthony morris.. now all these sex abuse scandals and news media are taking their power away.
That's the second biggest bun I have ever seen.
im recalling a time when i sat and circled words in a watchtower article, indicating strongly the fact that it is in fact the writters opinion.. however just the suggestion in the sentence these words are ignored.. for example.
it is our understanding.
we believe this to be the case.
Just to get into the spirit of whatever hairtrigger is drinking right now.
The WT are sons of fatherless goats!
.....spam, spam spam, spam Sir spamalot
I digress.. hmmm witnessing on line yes very very spammy.
Sorry I pushed submit too soon.
Anyway, does anyone think the web site will become interactive?
E- witnessing maybe?
yes it happen again with our youngest son.
this last monday we got a letter from him telling us how unloving we are because we are no longer jw.
cult and not had kids.
You could also point out that he is going against WT policy just writing you.
I agree with Lisa if he chooses to break contact that is his right I suppose,
but he has no right to judge you for yours.
i got to thinking the other day about how the wt uses loaded language.
and spin to give thinly veiled credence and so-called respectability to their policies.. but why not call a spade a spade.
why not identify the true nature of a policy,.
Convention = pep rally
public talk = talk advertised as "public" but unless you speak JW, most of the content will be lost on you.
