sparrowdown

Joined

• started 56 topics
• posted 5,668 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by sparrowdown

• 
  20

  oh dear....

  by stuckinarut2 in

  1. social
  2. entertainment

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bhhs5lhr00.

  words.....just cant find the words......

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  sparrowdown

  I love the way this guy equates saying no to his offer of "learning the bible for the rest of your life" to being rude.

  That's special.
• 
  33

  Video: "Iron Sharpens Iron"

  by wifibandit in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joehewofiba.

  is this supposed to placate the ones who have been recently fired?

  is this a sign of the aging jw leadership?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  sparrowdown

  The elephant in this room is called #wasted life!
• 
  13

  An incident was reported to me at a cong near me.

  by poopie in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  this df persons walks up to the cood and says i would like to give you my reinstatement letter because i have been attending meetings here ,the cood says do not give me that letter i need to observe you first then you can rurn in letter i ask my friend is that something new?

  the person only wants to return because they want to speak to there mother and father and siblings so thats the resl reason but now they have to sit and wait for this elder to observe them what hypocrites.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  sparrowdown

  No, they don't have to wait for the elders to observe them.

  The elders have no real authority.

  The elders have no business talking about or observing anybody.

  Face palm.
• 
  82

  Intriguing - but Unsubstantiated!

  by The Searcher in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  according to one source on a western european 'apostate' website, the org's plan is to abandon the name "jehovah's witnesses" in the future, and replace it with "worshippers of jehovah.".

  http://www.bruderinfo-aktuell.de/index.php/fixnews/#comment-4313 .

  the gist of the account appears to be a repeat of rutherford's re-branding and debunking of old predictions made by the previous shower of fakers.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  sparrowdown

  I agree onefinger, the word witness is problematic as the general public do not know the bible verse it supposedly is taken from, so worshipper would be easier to understand from a marketing of the religion perspective.

  I'd say the rumor is possible if not probable, but we shall see I suppose.
• 
  82

  Intriguing - but Unsubstantiated!

  by The Searcher in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  according to one source on a western european 'apostate' website, the org's plan is to abandon the name "jehovah's witnesses" in the future, and replace it with "worshippers of jehovah.".

  http://www.bruderinfo-aktuell.de/index.php/fixnews/#comment-4313 .

  the gist of the account appears to be a repeat of rutherford's re-branding and debunking of old predictions made by the previous shower of fakers.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  sparrowdown

  The "two witness" rule would change to the two worshipper rule.

  Same food different names on the menu.
• 
  82

  Intriguing - but Unsubstantiated!

  by The Searcher in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  according to one source on a western european 'apostate' website, the org's plan is to abandon the name "jehovah's witnesses" in the future, and replace it with "worshippers of jehovah.".

  http://www.bruderinfo-aktuell.de/index.php/fixnews/#comment-4313 .

  the gist of the account appears to be a repeat of rutherford's re-branding and debunking of old predictions made by the previous shower of fakers.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  sparrowdown

  Well Jackson did say at ARC that it would be presumptuous to say they are the only ones who speak for God.

  Maybe he was unwittingly giving away something there, ie a change from Witness to Worshipper.
• 
  82

  Intriguing - but Unsubstantiated!

  by The Searcher in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  according to one source on a western european 'apostate' website, the org's plan is to abandon the name "jehovah's witnesses" in the future, and replace it with "worshippers of jehovah.".

  http://www.bruderinfo-aktuell.de/index.php/fixnews/#comment-4313 .

  the gist of the account appears to be a repeat of rutherford's re-branding and debunking of old predictions made by the previous shower of fakers.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  sparrowdown

  They will go from j-dubs to WOJers

  Kinda has a ring to it. The Jolly WoJers..... J-WOs....
• 
  81

  WT Society SEC Records : Hedge Funds, Cayman Islands, Financial Losses - Links

  by flipper in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  so my wife and i were curious so i researched some financial links and found records indicating that the wt society has been operating at a loss since the year 2012. as you read the links it shows a loss of 10 million $$$ in 2012, about 16 million $$$ in 2013, and a whopping loss of 56 million $$$ in 2014 - where the expenditures exceeded the revenues for each of those years in the amount i've mentioned.

  also there is a link on this same website with the sec records indicating that the wt society and it's representatives funneled 40 million $$$$ into hedge funds in the cayman islands as early as 2007. if you look online on other sites you can see evidence that indicates the wt society attended hedge fund conferences to look into more shadiness in 2011 and isn't it curious that by 2012 the wt society started showing losses.

  anyway here is the link : https://www.watchtowerlies.com/the_watchtower_revenue.html .. feel free to check this link out and other links on that link indicating the cayman island connection.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  sparrowdown

  Yup, I smell a rather large rat with this financial situation.

  Can't wait to find out what it is.

  Good job Mr and Mrs Flipper, you guys are the best xxoo
• 
  362

  No 'Tight Pants' policy is now official - classed as 'disturbing'

  by wizzstick in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  in short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?

  )- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.

  wow.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  sparrowdown

  CC - sorry if I misunderstand, but, are you saying commenting on apostate websites is not a dfing offense at the moment but it will be in the future?
• 
  362

  No 'Tight Pants' policy is now official - classed as 'disturbing'

  by wizzstick in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  in short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?

  )- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.

  wow.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  sparrowdown

  Are we there yet, are we there yet? Hmmm, seems not.

  Oh well, here goes nothing.

  1) JWs are a soul-sucking, family-destroying, xenophobic, homophobic, mysogynistic, pedo- protecting cult.

  2) Any self-respecting "metrosexual" or anyone who values personal freedom - run, run as fast as you can away from this cult.

  3) Please stop thinking representing a cult in public or door to door is a personal right worth fighting for -it's not.

  Drop the mic.